Accepted for/Published in: Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Date Submitted: Jan 21, 2021
Date Accepted: Nov 30, 2021
Comparison of patient self-reported data to physician-reported data in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis
ABSTRACT
Background:
Patient-based registries can help advance research in rare diseases such as eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), a complex, multi-organ form of anti-cytoplasm neutrophil antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis.
Objective:
To compare patient-reported vs. physician-reported manifestations, treatments, and outcomes for patients with EGPA.
Methods:
Comparative analysis of patients ≥18 years with EGPA in Canada or the United States from two separate cohorts: i) The Vasculitis Patient-Powered Research Network (VPPRN), a self-enrolled, secure portal with patient-entered data updated quarterly (2013-2019), vs. ii) The Vasculitis Clinical Research Consortium (VCRC) observational studies, a physician-entered database (2003-2019) of patients who fulfilled the 1990 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for EGPA. Studied parameters included demographics, clinical manifestations, ANCA status, treatments, and relapses.
Results:
Data from 195 patients with a validated diagnosis of EGPA in the VPPRN and 354 patients enrolled in the VCRC were analyzed. Compared to the VCRC cohort, the patients in the VPPRN cohort were more commonly female (69.2% vs. 59.0% in the VCRC cohort; P =.02), younger at diagnosis (47.3 vs. 50.0 years; P =.03), reported similar frequencies of asthma (96.2% vs 92.9% in VCRC; P =.13), cardiac manifestations (28.8% vs 21.2%; P =.06), but less frequent lung manifestations other than asthma, and more frequent disease manifestations in all other organ systems. ANCA positivity was 48.9% in the VPPRN patients vs. 38.9% (P=.05) in the VCRC cohort. Relapsing disease after study enrollment was reported in 32.3% patients in the VPPRN compared 35.7% of patients in the VCRC. Most therapies (glucocorticoids, cyclophosphamide, mepolizumab) were used at similar frequencies in both groups, except for rituximab with VPPRN patients reporting more use than VCRC cohort (24.1% vs. 10.5%; P =<.001).
Conclusions:
Patients with EGPA generally report having more manifestations of disease than physicians report for patients with EGPA. These differences imply the need to reconsider how patient- and physician-reported data are collected for the study of EGPA, and reevaluate disease specific definitions. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov: (1) VCRC Longitudinal Study (LS) NCT00315380 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00315380 and (2) One-Time DNA (OT) study NCT01241305 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01241305
Citation
Per the author's request the PDF is not available.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.