Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Jan 17, 2021
Date Accepted: Jan 20, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Safety and Acceptability of a Natural Language Artificial Intelligence Assistant to Deliver Clinical Follow-up to Cataract Surgery Patients: Proposal

de Pennington N, Mole G, Lim E, Milne-Ives M, Normando E, Xue K, Meinert E

Safety and Acceptability of a Natural Language Artificial Intelligence Assistant to Deliver Clinical Follow-up to Cataract Surgery Patients: Proposal

JMIR Res Protoc 2021;10(7):e27227

DOI: 10.2196/27227

PMID: 34319248

PMCID: 8367096

Safety and acceptability of a natural-language AI assistant to deliver clinical follow-up to cataract surgery patients: Proposal for a pragmatic evaluation

  • Nick de Pennington; 
  • Guy Mole; 
  • Ernest Lim; 
  • Madison Milne-Ives; 
  • Eduardo Normando; 
  • Kanmin Xue; 
  • Edward Meinert

ABSTRACT

Background:

Due to an ageing population, the demand for many services is exceeding the capacity of the clinical workforce. As a result, staff are facing a crisis of burnout from being pressured to deliver high-volume workloads, driving increasing costs for providers. Artificial intelligence, in the form of conversational agents, presents a possible opportunity to enable efficiencies in the delivery of care.

Objective:

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness, usability, and acceptability of Dora - an AI-enabled autonomous telemedicine call - for detection of post-operative cataract surgery patients who require further assessment. The study’s objectives are to: 1) establish Dora’s efficacy in comparison to an expert clinician, 2) determine baseline sensitivity and specificity for detection of true complications, 3) evaluate patient acceptability, 4) collect evidence for cost-effectiveness, and 5) capture data to support further development and evaluation.

Methods:

Based on implementation science, the interdisciplinary study will be a mixed-methods phase one pilot establishing inter-observer reliability of the system, usability, and acceptability. This will be done using using the following scales and frameworks: the system usability scale; assessment of Health Information Technology Interventions in Evidence-Based Medicine Evaluation Framework; the telehealth usability questionnaire (TUQ); the Non-Adoption, Abandonment and Challenges to the Scale-up, Spread and Suitability (NASSS) framework.

Results:

The results will be included in the final evaluation paper, which we aim to publish in 2022. The study will last eighteen months: seven months of evaluation and intervention refinement, nine months of implementation and follow-up, and two months of post-evaluation analysis and write-up.

Conclusions:

The project’s key contributions will be evidence on artificial intelligence voice conversational agent effectiveness, and associated usability and acceptability. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

de Pennington N, Mole G, Lim E, Milne-Ives M, Normando E, Xue K, Meinert E

Safety and Acceptability of a Natural Language Artificial Intelligence Assistant to Deliver Clinical Follow-up to Cataract Surgery Patients: Proposal

JMIR Res Protoc 2021;10(7):e27227

DOI: 10.2196/27227

PMID: 34319248

PMCID: 8367096

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.