Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jan 10, 2021
Date Accepted: May 6, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Co-designing a Lifestyle-Focused Text Message Intervention for Women After Breast Cancer Treatment: Mixed Methods Study

Singleton A, Raeside R, Partridge SR, Hayes M, Maka K, Hyun KK, Thiagalingam A, Chow CK, Sherman K, Elder E, Redfern J

Co-designing a Lifestyle-Focused Text Message Intervention for Women After Breast Cancer Treatment: Mixed Methods Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(6):e27076

DOI: 10.2196/27076

PMID: 34125072

PMCID: 8240797

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Codesigning and pilot testing a lifestyle-focused text message intervention for women after breast cancer treatment: A mixed-methods study

  • Anna Singleton; 
  • Rebecca Raeside; 
  • Stephanie R Partridge; 
  • Molly Hayes; 
  • Katherine Maka; 
  • Karice K Hyun; 
  • Aravinda Thiagalingam; 
  • Clara K Chow; 
  • Kerry Sherman; 
  • Elisabeth Elder; 
  • Julie Redfern

ABSTRACT

Background:

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Recovery from breast cancer treatment can be mentally and physically challenging. Text message programs offer a novel way to provide health information and support but few programs are co-designed with consumer representatives.

Objective:

This study aimed to co-design and pilot test a lifestyle-focused text message program to support women’s mental and physical health after treatment.

Methods:

Iterative mixed-methods three-step process: 1) co-design workshop with consumers, health professionals/researchers with drafting text messages; 2) consumer and health professionals/researchers evaluation plus readability (Flesch-Kincaid score) and 3) pilot testing of message delivery software. For the consumer and health professional review, content was scored (5-point Likert scale) for ease-of-understanding, usefulness and appropriateness and additional free-text responses and semi-structured interviews were conducted

Results:

In Step 1, co-designed text messages (n=189) were semi-personalised and main content themes were: i) physical activity and healthy eating, ii) medications and side effects, iii) mental health and iv) general breast cancer information. In Step 2, consumers (n=14) and health professionals/researchers (n=14) provided 870 reviews of 189 messages and found most messages easy-to-understand (92%), useful (86%) and appropriate (84%) and most (156/189; 83%). However, consumers rated 50 messages differently to health professionals/researchers. Based on evaluations/feedback, 71 messages deleted, 69 edited and 12 new messages were created related to fatigue, self-care and cognition. The final 130 text messages had a mean (SD) Flesch-Kincaid 7.12 (2.8) grade level and 68.9 (15.5) ease-of-reading score representing “standard” reading ease. In Step 3, participants successfully received 16 text messages with no technical issues.

Conclusions:

Co-designing and evaluating a bank of evidence-based lifestyle-focused text messages with breast cancer survivors, health professionals and researchers was feasible. Consumer evaluations differed from health professionals/researchers and significantly improved the message quality. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Singleton A, Raeside R, Partridge SR, Hayes M, Maka K, Hyun KK, Thiagalingam A, Chow CK, Sherman K, Elder E, Redfern J

Co-designing a Lifestyle-Focused Text Message Intervention for Women After Breast Cancer Treatment: Mixed Methods Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(6):e27076

DOI: 10.2196/27076

PMID: 34125072

PMCID: 8240797

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.