Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cancer

Date Submitted: Jan 5, 2021
Date Accepted: Feb 20, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effect of Collaborative Review of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes for Shared Reporting in Breast Cancer Patients: Descriptive Comparative Study

Trojan A, Bättig B, Mannhart M, Seifert B, Brauchbar MN, Egbring M

Effect of Collaborative Review of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes for Shared Reporting in Breast Cancer Patients: Descriptive Comparative Study

JMIR Cancer 2021;7(1):e26950

DOI: 10.2196/26950

PMID: 33729162

PMCID: 8088839

Effect of collaborative review of ePROs for shared reporting in breast cancer patients: a descriptive comparison

  • Andreas Trojan; 
  • Basil Bättig; 
  • Meinrad Mannhart; 
  • Burkhardt Seifert; 
  • Mathis N. Brauchbar; 
  • Marco Egbring

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital monitoring of treatment related symptoms and patient self-reported outcome gain importance for quality of care in cancer. The Consilium Care app engages cancer patients for standardized reporting of wellbeing and treatment related symptoms in outpatient settings.

Objective:

We compare the utility of two versions of a subsequently employed mobile application (app) for monitoring of electronically captured patient-reported outcome (ePRO), and test our hypothesis that an intended shared review of symptoms in patient-physician collaboration creates an impact on the number of data entries.

Methods:

For descriptive comparison of utility of two slightly different app versions information was made available from an early breast cancer trial (app version 1) and an ongoing study also including patients with advanced disease (version 2). In both app versions, patients and doctors were allowed to share the information from data entries during consultations. App version 2, however, randomly selected symptoms with request for a detailed and shared regular patient-doctor review in order to focus on collection and appropriate interpretation regarding awareness and guidance for severity grading. Number and type of symptom entries, satisfaction with both app versions and patients` perceived effects during consultations were included for the analysis. Symptom severity grading according to CTCAE was performed using a horizontal slider and indicated in descriptive terminology in both apps, while a graphical display facilitated the illustration of symptom history charts.

Results:

In total, 192 patients electronically reported 11`437 data entries on wellbeing and 33`380 data entries on individual symptoms. 628 (of 872 intended) requested patient-doctor symptom reviews were performed in App version 2. Both, the amount of data entries per patient and day for wellbeing (0.3 vs 1.0; p<0.001) and for symptoms appeared significantly higher in App version 2 (1.3 vs 1.9 data entries; p=0.04). Overall satisfaction with both app versions was high, although version 2 was perceived in general to be more helpful.

Conclusions:

The request of collaborative patient-doctor symptom review is likely to affect the number of digital symptom data entries. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov Trial number: NCT02004496 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02004496 ClinicalTrials.gov Trial number: NCT03578731 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03578731


 Citation

Please cite as:

Trojan A, Bättig B, Mannhart M, Seifert B, Brauchbar MN, Egbring M

Effect of Collaborative Review of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes for Shared Reporting in Breast Cancer Patients: Descriptive Comparative Study

JMIR Cancer 2021;7(1):e26950

DOI: 10.2196/26950

PMID: 33729162

PMCID: 8088839

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.