Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Nursing

Date Submitted: Jan 4, 2021
Date Accepted: Apr 7, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Academic Electronic Health Records in Undergraduate Nursing Education: Mixed Methods Pilot Study

Kleib M, Jackman D, Duarte Wisnesky U, Ali S

Academic Electronic Health Records in Undergraduate Nursing Education: Mixed Methods Pilot Study

JMIR Nursing 2021;4(2):e26944

DOI: 10.2196/26944

PMID: 34345797

PMCID: 8328266

Academic Electronic Health Record in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Pilot Study

  • Manal Kleib; 
  • Deirdre Jackman; 
  • Uirá Duarte Wisnesky; 
  • Shamsa Ali

ABSTRACT

Background:

Teaching students about the electronic health records presents challenges for most nursing programs primarily due to limited training opportunities within clinical practice settings. A simulated electronic health record is an experiential, learner-centered strategy that enables students to acquire and apply informatics knowledge needed for working with electronic records in a safe learning environment prior to encounters with real patients.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to provide a preliminary evaluation of the Lippincott DocuCare simulated electronic health record and feasibility issues associated with its implementation.

Methods:

We used a one group/pre-post-test, surveys and focus group interviews with students and instructors to pilot the DocuCare simulated electronic health record within an undergraduate nursing program in Western Canada.

Results:

A total of 23 students participated in this study, only 13 completed surveys were included in the analysis. The paired samples t-test for evaluating the impact of DocuCare on students’ self-reported informatics knowledge regarding documentation and data management and attitudes toward electronic health record revealed a statistically significant difference in the mean score of knowledge before (M = 2.95, SD = 0.58) and after using the DocuCare (M = 3.83, SD = 0.39), t (12) = 5.80, p<0.001 (two-tailed). There was no statistically significant difference in mean scores of attitudes toward electronic health record before (M = 3.75, SD = 0.40) and after using DocuCare (M = 3.70, SD = 0.34), t (12) = 0.391, p = 0.703 (two-tailed). Students’ accuracy of electronic documentation performance scores varied from somewhat accurate to completely accurate; however, performance improved for majority as they progressed from case scenario1 to 4. Almost two thirds of students indicated their overall understanding of nursing informatics as fair or inadequate. Both faculty and students were highly satisfied with DocuCare. Focus groups with 8 students and 3 educators revealed multiple themes. Participants shared suggestions regarding DocuCare product customization and strategies for potential integration in the undergraduate nursing programs.

Conclusions:

This study demonstrated the feasibility and suitability of DocuCare program as a tool to enhance students’ learning about informatics and computerized documentation in electronic health records. Recommendations will be made to academic leadership in the undergraduate programs. A controlled evaluation study will be conducted in the future.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kleib M, Jackman D, Duarte Wisnesky U, Ali S

Academic Electronic Health Records in Undergraduate Nursing Education: Mixed Methods Pilot Study

JMIR Nursing 2021;4(2):e26944

DOI: 10.2196/26944

PMID: 34345797

PMCID: 8328266

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.