Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Dec 23, 2020
Date Accepted: Jun 30, 2021
The Effect of Non-invasive Telemonitoring for Chronic Heart Failure on Healthcare Utilization: a Systematic Review
ABSTRACT
Background:
Chronic heart failure accounts for approximately 1-2% of healthcare expenditures in most developed countries. These costs are primarily driven by hospitalizations and comorbidities,. Telemonitoring has been proposed to reduce the number of hospitalizations and decrease the costs of treatments for patients with heart failure. However, the effects of telemonitoring on healthcare utilization remains unclear.
Objective:
The aim of this systematic review is to study the effect of telemonitoring programs on healthcare utilization and costs of patients with chronic heart failure. We assessed the effect of telemonitoring on hospitalizations, emergency-department visits, length of stay, hospital days, non-emergency department visits and healthcare costs.
Methods:
We searched Pubmed, Embase and Web of Science for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) and non-randomized studies on non-invasive telemonitoring and healthcare utilization. We included studies published between January 2010 and August 2020. For each study, we extracted the reported data on the effect of telemonitoring on healthcare utilization. We used p-values smaller than .05 and confidence intervals not including 1.00 to determine if the effect was statistically significant.
Results:
We included 16 RCTs and 13 non-randomized studies in this review. Inclusion criteria, population characteristics and outcome measures differed between the included studies. The majority of the studies showed no effect of telemonitoring on healthcare utilization. Number of hospitalizations were statistically significant reduced in 9 out of 24 (38%) studies whereas emergency department visits were reduced in 1 out of 8 studies. An increase in non-emergency department visits (6 out of 9 studies) were reported. Healthcare costs showed ambiguous results with three studies finding an increase of healthcare costs, three studies finding a reduction and four studies finding no significant differences. Healthcare cost reductions were realised through a reduction of hospitalizations whereas increases were caused by the high costs of the telemonitoring program or increased healthcare utilization.
Conclusions:
A majority of telemonitoring programs do not show clear effects on healthcare utilization measures, except for an increase in non-emergency outpatient department visits. This may be an unwarranted side-effect rather than a prerequisite for effective telemonitoring. The consequences of telemonitoring on non-emergency outpatient visits should receive more attention from regulators, payers and providers. This review further demonstrates the high clinical and methodological heterogeneity of telemonitoring programs. This should be taken into account in future meta-analyses aiming to identify effective components of telemonitoring programs.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.