Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Dec 16, 2020
Date Accepted: May 31, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 16, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Understanding Physicians’ Preferences for Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study

Nies S, Patel S, Shafer M, Longman L, Sharif I, Pina P

Understanding Physicians’ Preferences for Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(8):e26565

DOI: 10.2196/26565

PMID: 34227993

PMCID: 8366754

Understanding physicians’ preferences for telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic

  • Sarah Nies; 
  • Shae Patel; 
  • Melissa Shafer; 
  • Laura Longman; 
  • Iman Sharif; 
  • Paulo Pina

ABSTRACT

Background:

In contrast to the current broad dissemination of telemedicine across medical specialties, previous research focused on the effectiveness of telemedicine in special populations and for behavioral health encounters; demonstrating that both physician and patient factors impact the efficacious use of telemedicine.

Objective:

We evaluated physician perceptions of the appropriateness of telemedicine for patients attending the primary care practices of a federally qualified health center in New York City.

Methods:

Anonymous cross-sectional survey including closed and open-ended questions. We used chi-square to test whether providers from certain specialties were more likely to state they would use telemedicine in the future. We used t-test to compare age between those who would vs. would not use telemedicine. Then, we used logistic regression to test whether age and specialty were both correlated with desire to use telemedicine in the future. We used thematic content analysis to describe the reasons providers felt they would not want to use telemedicine in the future, and to describe the situations for which they felt telemedicine would be appropriate.

Results:

Of 272 FHC providers who were sent the electronic survey, 159(58%) responded within the 2-week survey time frame. Mean age of providers was 45 years (range 28-75). Overall, 81% stated they would use telemedicine in the future. Compared to the Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, Behavioral Health, Dental, and OB/GYN specialties, providers from Pediatrics, Med-Peds, Subspecialties and Surgery [Pro-telemedicine specialties] were more likely to believe telemedicine would be useful post pandemic (94% vs. 72%, p<0.05). Providers who reported they would use telemedicine in the future were younger [mean age 44(42-46) vs. 50(46-55), p<0.01). In regression analysis, both pro-telemedicine specialties and age were significantly associated with odds of reporting they would use telemedicine in the future [pro-specialties: 5.2(1.7-16.2); younger age: 1.05(1.01-1.08)]. Providers who did not want to use telemedicine in the future cited concerns about inadequate patient care, lack of physical patient interaction, technology issues, and lack of necessity. Providers who felt telemedicine would be useful cited the following situations: follow up visits, medication refills, urgent care, patient convenience, and specific conditions such has behavioral health, dermatology visits, and chronic care management.

Conclusions:

The majority of health providers in this resource poor setting in a federally qualified health center believed that telemedicine would be useful for providing care after the pandemic is over.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Nies S, Patel S, Shafer M, Longman L, Sharif I, Pina P

Understanding Physicians’ Preferences for Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(8):e26565

DOI: 10.2196/26565

PMID: 34227993

PMCID: 8366754

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.