Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Dec 11, 2020
Date Accepted: Jan 18, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Jan 19, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Suitability of Video Consultations During the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown: Cross-sectional Survey Among Norwegian General Practitioners

Johnsen TM, Norberg BL, Kristiansen E, Zanaboni P, Austad B, Krogh FH, Getz L

Suitability of Video Consultations During the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown: Cross-sectional Survey Among Norwegian General Practitioners

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(2):e26433

DOI: 10.2196/26433

PMID: 33465037

PMCID: 7872327

Suitability of Video Consultations During the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown: A Cross-Sectional Survey Among Norwegian GPs

  • Tor Magne Johnsen; 
  • Børge Lønnebakke Norberg; 
  • Eli Kristiansen; 
  • Paolo Zanaboni; 
  • Bjarne Austad; 
  • Frode Helgetun Krogh; 
  • Linn Getz

ABSTRACT

Background:

The COVID-19 pandemic imposed an acute, sharp rise in the use of video consultations (VCs) by general practitioners (GPs) in Norway.

Objective:

This study aims to document GPs’ experiences with the large-scale uptake of VCs in the natural experiment context of the pandemic.

Methods:

A nationwide, cross-sectional online survey was conducted amongst Norwegian GPs during the pandemic lockdown (April 14–May 3, 2020). Each respondent was asked to evaluate up to 10 VCs. Basic demographic characteristics of the GPs and their practices were collected. The associations between GPs’ perceived suitability of the VCs, the nature of the patients’ main problems, prior knowledge of the patients (relational continuity), and follow-up of previously presented problems (episodic continuity) were explored by descriptive statistics, diagrams, and Chi-square tests.

Results:

1,237 GPs (26% of the target group) responded to the survey. Amongst these, 1,000 GPs offered VCs, and 855 GPs evaluated a total of 3,484 VCs. Most GPs who offered VCs (81%) had no experience with VCs before the pandemic. 49% of the evaluated VCs were considered to have similar or even better suitability to assess the main reason for contact, compared to face-to-face consultations. In the presence of relational continuity, VCs were considered equal to or better than face-to-face consultations in 57% of cases, as opposed to 32% when the patient was unknown. The suitability rate for follow-up consultations (episodic continuity) was 61%, compared to 35% for new patient problems. Suitability varied considerably across clinical contact reasons. VCs were found most suitable for anxiety and life stress, depression, administrative purposes, as well as for longstanding or complex problems that normally require multiple follow-up consultations. The GPs estimate that they will conduct about 20% of their consultations by video in a future, non-pandemic setting.

Conclusions:

Our study of VCs performed in general practice during the pandemic lockdown indicates a clear, future role for VCs in future, non-pandemic settings. The strong and consistent association between continuity of care and GPs’ perceptions of the suitability of VCs is a new and important finding with considerable relevance for future primary health care planning.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Johnsen TM, Norberg BL, Kristiansen E, Zanaboni P, Austad B, Krogh FH, Getz L

Suitability of Video Consultations During the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown: Cross-sectional Survey Among Norwegian General Practitioners

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(2):e26433

DOI: 10.2196/26433

PMID: 33465037

PMCID: 7872327

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.