Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Dec 9, 2020
Date Accepted: May 30, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Use of Twitter by Medical Journals: Systematic Review of the Literature

Erskine N, Hendricks S

The Use of Twitter by Medical Journals: Systematic Review of the Literature

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(7):e26378

DOI: 10.2196/26378

PMID: 34319238

PMCID: 8367184

The use of Twitter by medical journals: a systematic review of the literature.

  • Natalie Erskine; 
  • Sharief Hendricks

ABSTRACT

Background:

Medical journals use Twitter to engage and disseminate their research articles and implement a range of strategies to maximize reach and impact

Objective:

To systematically review the literature to synthesize and describe the different Twitter strategies utilized by medical journals and its effect on journal impact and readership, to inform practice.

Methods:

A systematic search of the literature was conducted using 4 electronic databases and manual searches to locate peer-reviewed studies published before February 2020.

Results:

The search identified 44 original research studies that evaluated Twitter strategies implemented by medical journals and/or analyzed the relationship between twitter metrics with alternative and/or citation-based metrics. The key findings suggest promoting publications on Twitter improve citation-based and alternative metrics for academic medical journals. Moreover, implementing different Twitter strategies maximizes the amount of attention publications and journals receive. Four key Twitter strategies are implemented by medical journals: Tweeting the title and link of the article; infographics; podcasts and hosting monthly virtual journal clubs. Each strategy is successful in the promotion of publications but have differing metrics to measure success; costs; and effects on dissemination, readership, and translation of research findings.

Conclusions:

It is difficult to conclude which strategy is most effective Therefore, we recommend that journals and researchers incorporate a combination of Twitter strategies to maximize research impact and captivate an audience with a variety of preferred learning methods.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Erskine N, Hendricks S

The Use of Twitter by Medical Journals: Systematic Review of the Literature

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(7):e26378

DOI: 10.2196/26378

PMID: 34319238

PMCID: 8367184

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.