Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting

Date Submitted: Nov 27, 2020
Date Accepted: Mar 31, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Parent Experiences With Electronic Medication Monitoring in Pediatric Asthma Management: Qualitative Study

Kan K, Shaunfield S, Kanaley M, Chadha A, Boon K, Foster CC, Morales L, Labellarte P, Vojta D, Gupta RS

Parent Experiences With Electronic Medication Monitoring in Pediatric Asthma Management: Qualitative Study

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2021;4(2):e25811

DOI: 10.2196/25811

PMID: 33890861

PMCID: 8105758

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Parent Experiences with Electronic Medication Monitoring in Pediatric Asthma: A Qualitative Study

  • Kristin Kan; 
  • Sara Shaunfield; 
  • Madeleine Kanaley; 
  • Avneet Chadha; 
  • Kathy Boon; 
  • Carolyn C. Foster; 
  • Luis Morales; 
  • Patricia Labellarte; 
  • Deneen Vojta; 
  • Ruchi S. Gupta

ABSTRACT

Background:

Electronic medication monitoring (EMM) is a digital tool that can be used for tracking daily medication use. Previous studies of EMM in asthma have examined experiences of adults or have studied pediatric interventions that use EMM for less than a year. To understand acceptance of an EMM-enhanced intervention, we explore the experiences of parents of children with asthma, recruited from outpatient practices for a 12-month intervention trial.

Objective:

Through qualitative inquiry, we studied: (1) How did using the intervention change parents/caregivers’ experiences of managing their child’s asthma, and (2) What do parents recommend for improving the intervention in the future?

Methods:

Parents were recruited from the intervention arm of a multi-component, health intervention enhanced by Bluetooth-enabled sensors placed on inhaler medications. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 parents of children with asthma (4-12 years old). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and inductively analyzed using a constant comparative approach.

Results:

Interview participants reflected an even mix of publicly and privately insured children and a diverse racial-ethnic demographic. Parents discussed six key themes related to their experience with the EMM-enhanced intervention: compatibility with their lifestyle, the impact on asthma management, impact on their child’s health, emotional impact of the intervention, children’s engagement in asthma management with the intervention, and recommendations for future intervention design.

Conclusions:

Our qualitative study of parents found that the intervention with EMM over 12 months was overall compatible with their daily lives, positively influenced their preventive and acute asthma management, and promoted child engagement. Parents in our study found the intervention acceptable and generally favorable. While use of technology-enhanced tools are increasingly popular in healthcare delivery and consumer health care, our study highlighted that careful attention must also be paid to the unique needs of parents of children with asthma and understanding how a digital tool can be adopted into their daily disease management.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kan K, Shaunfield S, Kanaley M, Chadha A, Boon K, Foster CC, Morales L, Labellarte P, Vojta D, Gupta RS

Parent Experiences With Electronic Medication Monitoring in Pediatric Asthma Management: Qualitative Study

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2021;4(2):e25811

DOI: 10.2196/25811

PMID: 33890861

PMCID: 8105758

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.