Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Oct 22, 2020
Date Accepted: Nov 20, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Public Reactions to the New York State Policy on Flavored Electronic Cigarettes on Twitter: Observational Study

Sun L, Lu X, Xie Z, Li D

Public Reactions to the New York State Policy on Flavored Electronic Cigarettes on Twitter: Observational Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2022;8(2):e25216

DOI: 10.2196/25216

PMID: 35113035

PMCID: 8855289

Public Reactions to the New York State Policy on Flavored E-Cigarettes on Twitter: Observational Study

  • Li Sun; 
  • Xinyi Lu; 
  • Zidian Xie; 
  • Dongmei Li

ABSTRACT

Background:

Flavored electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have become popular in recent years, especially among youth and young adults. To address the epidemic of e-cigarettes, New York State approved a ban on sales of most flavored vaping products other than tobacco and menthol flavors on September 17, 2019.

Objective:

This study aimed to examine the public responses on social media to the policy on flavored e-cigarettes in New York State.

Methods:

Twitter posts (tweets) related to e-cigarettes and the New York State policy on flavored e-cigarettes were collected using Twitter streaming API from June 2019 to December 2019. Tweets from New York State, and other states that did not have a flavored e-cigarettes policy were extracted. Sentiment analysis was applied to analyze the proportion of negative and positive tweets about e-cigarettes or the flavor policy. Topic modeling was applied to e-cigarettes related datasets to identify the most frequent topics before and after the announcement of the New York State policy on flavored e-cigarettes.

Results:

Our results showed that average number of tweets related to e-cigarettes and the New York State policy on flavored e-cigarettes increased in both New York State and other states after the NY flavor policy was announced. Sentiment analysis revealed that after the announcement of the New York State flavor policy, in both New York State and other states, the proportion of negative tweets on e-cigarettes increased, from 34.07% to 44.58% and from 32.48% to 44.40% respectively, while positive tweets decreased significantly, from 39.03% to 32.86% and from 42.78% to 33.93% respectively. The majority of tweets about the New York State flavor policy were negative in both New York State (from 88.78% to 83.46%) and other states (from 78.43% to 81.54%) while New York State had a higher proportion of negative tweets than other states. Topic modeling results demonstrated that teenage vaping and health problems were the most discussed topic associated with e-cigarettes.

Conclusions:

Public attitudes toward e-cigarettes became more negative on Twitter after the New York State announced the policy on flavored e-cigarettes. Twitter users in other states that did not have such a policy on flavored e-cigarettes paid close attention to New York State flavor policy. This study provides some valuable information about the potential impact of the flavored e-cigarettes policy in New York State on public attitudes towards the flavored e-cigarettes.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Sun L, Lu X, Xie Z, Li D

Public Reactions to the New York State Policy on Flavored Electronic Cigarettes on Twitter: Observational Study

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2022;8(2):e25216

DOI: 10.2196/25216

PMID: 35113035

PMCID: 8855289

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.