Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Oct 16, 2020
Date Accepted: Apr 25, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Phone App Intervention for Coping With Cancer as a Young Adult: Pilot Trial and Thematic Analysis

Poort H, Ryan A, MacDougall K, Malinowski P, MacDonald A, Markin Z, Pirl W, Greer J, Fasciano K

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Phone App Intervention for Coping With Cancer as a Young Adult: Pilot Trial and Thematic Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(6):e25069

DOI: 10.2196/25069

PMID: 34114957

PMCID: 8235294

Mobile Phone Application Intervention for Coping with Cancer as a Young Adult: Feasibility Study

  • Hanneke Poort; 
  • Annelise Ryan; 
  • Katelyn MacDougall; 
  • Paige Malinowski; 
  • Anna MacDonald; 
  • Zach Markin; 
  • William Pirl; 
  • Joseph Greer; 
  • Karen Fasciano

ABSTRACT

Background:

Many young adult (YA) patients do not receive adequate psychosocial services to help them cope with cancer.

Objective:

To assess the feasibility and acceptability of a smartphone application (“iaya”) intervention that was designed to create an engaged community of YA patients and help them learn emotional coping skills.

Methods:

For this single-group pilot trial, 25 YA patients aged 18-39 years who were receiving active cancer treatment were asked to use the “iaya” app for 12 weeks. To collect app usage data, we used Mixpanel, an analytics platform for apps. Feasibility was assessed through rates of app sessions and coping exercises engaged, and intervention acceptability was evaluated with an app usability questionnaire and through qualitative interviews at study completion. We collected patient-reported outcome (PRO) data at baseline and at week 12 to explore self-efficacy for coping with cancer, self-efficacy for managing emotions, perceived emotional support, and quality of life.

Results:

Baseline PRO data indicated that participants scored relatively low on perceived emotional support, but reasonably high on self-efficacy for coping with cancer and managing emotions, as well as quality of life. Participants had a mean of 13 app sessions (SD=14) and 2 coping exercises engaged (SD=3.83) in 12 weeks. Only 8.7% of participants met our combined feasibility definition of ≥ 10 app sessions and ≥ 3 copings skills from different categories. Participants’ mean usability score was 73.7% (SD, 10.84), exceeding our predefined threshold of ≥ 70%, and qualitative feedback was generally positive.

Conclusions:

While perceived acceptable by patients, the “iaya” smartphone app did not meet the a priori feasibility criteria as a stand-alone app intervention. Future studies should screen participants for unmet coping needs and consider integrating the app as part of YA patients’ psychosocial care. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04119869.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Poort H, Ryan A, MacDougall K, Malinowski P, MacDonald A, Markin Z, Pirl W, Greer J, Fasciano K

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Phone App Intervention for Coping With Cancer as a Young Adult: Pilot Trial and Thematic Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(6):e25069

DOI: 10.2196/25069

PMID: 34114957

PMCID: 8235294

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.