Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Oct 4, 2020
Date Accepted: Dec 12, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Online Medical Record Nonuse Among Patients: Data Analysis Study of the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey

Elkefi S, Yu Z, Asan O

Online Medical Record Nonuse Among Patients: Data Analysis Study of the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(2):e24767

DOI: 10.2196/24767

PMID: 33616539

PMCID: 7939938

Why patients avoid online medical record use: Findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2019

  • Safa Elkefi; 
  • Zhengyuan Yu; 
  • Onur Asan

ABSTRACT

Background:

Online medical records are being used to organize processes in clinical and outpatient settings and to forge doctor-patient communication techniques to build mutual understanding and trust.

Objective:

This paper aims to understand the reasons why patients tend to avoid using online medical records and to compare the perceptions different patients have of online medical records based on demographics and cancer diagnosis using a nationally representative survey.

Methods:

We used data from the Health Information National Trends survey pooled HINTS 5 Cycle 3 data and assessed outcomes using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. The 4328 patients included in the analysis had experienced an outpatient visit within the previous 12 months and answered the online behavior question regarding their use of online medical records.

Results:

Patients who are non-users of online medical records consisted 58.36% of the participants. The results show that the majority of nonusers are Hispanic (67.3%), Non-Hispanic Black (66.4%) and patients who are above 65 years old (63.6%). The oldest population (above 65 years old) was less likely to use online medical records (OR >65=1.51, P < 0.001). Non-Hispanic White patients were more likely to use online medical records compared to the other two races (OR black=1.71; OR hispanic=1.65, P <0.001). Patients who were diagnosed with cancer were more likely to use online medical records compared to patients with no cancer (ORnocancer=1.31, P <0.01). Among nonusers, older patients (>=65 years old) preferred speaking directly to their healthcare providers (ORSpeakDirectly =1.76, P <0.001), were more concerned about privacy issues caused by online medical records (ORConcernedPrivacy =1.79, P <0.001), and felt uncomfortable using the systems (OR Uncomfortable =10.55, P <0.001) compared to age 18-34 years old. Black and Hispanic patients were more concerned about privacy issues (ORH-NHB =1.42, P < 0.01).

Conclusions:

Studies should consider social factors such as gender, race/ethnicity, and age when monitoring trends in eHealth use to ensure that eHealth use does not induce greater health status and health care disparities between people with different backgrounds and demographics.Online medical records, cancer, patient portals, communication.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Elkefi S, Yu Z, Asan O

Online Medical Record Nonuse Among Patients: Data Analysis Study of the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(2):e24767

DOI: 10.2196/24767

PMID: 33616539

PMCID: 7939938

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.