Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Sep 28, 2020
Date Accepted: Dec 9, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Toward a Working Definition of eCohort Studies in Health Research: Narrative Literature Review

Nittas V, Puhan MA, von Wyl V

Toward a Working Definition of eCohort Studies in Health Research: Narrative Literature Review

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021;7(1):e24588

DOI: 10.2196/24588

PMID: 33475521

PMCID: 7861999

e-Cohort studies in health research: Towards a working definition

  • Vasileios Nittas; 
  • Milo Alan Puhan; 
  • Viktor von Wyl

ABSTRACT

Background:

The wide availability of internet-connected devices and new sensor technologies increasingly infuse longitudinal, observational study designs and cohort studies. Simultaneously, the costly and time-consuming nature of traditional cohorts has given rise to alternative, technology-driven designs, such as electronic cohorts (e-cohorts), which remain inadequately described by the scientific literature.

Objective:

To outline and discuss what may constitute an e-cohort, as well as to formulate a first working definition for health researchers.

Methods:

A two-staged review and synthesis process, comparing ten traditional and ten e-cohorts across the six core steps in their life-cycle of cohort designs

Results:

E-cohorts are a novel type of technology-driven cohort studies that are not physically tight to a clinical setting, follow more relaxed and not necessarily random sampling procedures, are primarily based on self-reported and digitally collected data, while systematically aim to leverage the internet and digitalization to achieve flexibility, interactivity, patient-centeredness, and scalability. That comes with some hurdles, such as data quality, generalizability, and privacy concerns.

Conclusions:

E-cohorts have similarities to their traditional counterparts, however, are distinct enough to be treated as an individual type of cohort design. The novelty of e-cohorts comes with a range of strengths and weaknesses, that require further exploration.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Nittas V, Puhan MA, von Wyl V

Toward a Working Definition of eCohort Studies in Health Research: Narrative Literature Review

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021;7(1):e24588

DOI: 10.2196/24588

PMID: 33475521

PMCID: 7861999

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.