Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Sep 14, 2020
Date Accepted: Jan 17, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Educational Needs and Preferences for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research in the Cystic Fibrosis Community: Mixed Methods Study

Godfrey EM, Kazmerski TM, Brown G, Thayer E, Mentch L, Pam M, Al Achkar M

Educational Needs and Preferences for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research in the Cystic Fibrosis Community: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(3):e24302

DOI: 10.2196/24302

PMID: 33661127

PMCID: 7974760

Educational needs and preferences for patient-centered outcomes research in the cystic fibrosis community: A mixed-methods study

  • Emily M. Godfrey; 
  • Traci M. Kazmerski; 
  • Georgia Brown; 
  • Erin Thayer; 
  • Laura Mentch; 
  • Molly Pam; 
  • Morhaf Al Achkar

ABSTRACT

Background:

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a rare, life-shortening, multi-organ disease that has seen significant increases in life expectancy. Many advances in CF care are thanks to the dedicated and active participation of people with CF as research subjects. Unfortunately, most CF research teams still do not fully partner with people with CF or their caregivers.

Objective:

To determine the interest, knowledge gaps, and desired format for patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) training in the CF community.

Methods:

We surveyed patients, caregivers, researchers, research staff and diverse healthcare providers via listservs and social media outreach about their knowledge of, experience with, and preferences for PCOR training components. We followed the survey with three small-group discussion sessions with 22 participants who completed the survey to establish consensus and prioritize key learning components of a PCOR training program. We summarized results using descriptive statistics.

Results:

A total of 170 participants completed the survey (56% patients/caregivers; 44% researchers/healthcare providers). Among providers, 26% were physicians/advanced practice providers, 20% nurses, and 54% were from other disciplines. Among all participants, 86% expressed interest in learning about PCOR, although training topics and training format differed between the patient/caregiver and researcher/healthcare provider groups. Before participating in PCOR, patients/caregivers wanted to understand more about expectations of them as partners on PCOR research teams (85%). On the other hand, researchers/healthcare providers desired information on how to include outcomes important to patients/caregivers (74%) and the quality and impact of PCOR research (70%, 69%, respectively). Patients/caregivers were most interested in learning about the time commitment as a PCOR team member (78%). Researchers/healthcare providers wanted to receive training about how to establish trust (64%) and maintain confidentiality (64%) when including patient or caregiver partners on the PCOR team. During follow-up discussions, participants emphasized the importance of addressing the traditional patient/caregiver and research/healthcare provider hierarchy by teaching about transparency, appreciation, creating a common language between the groups, and providing specific training on “how” to do PCOR.

Conclusions:

Our findings suggest CF community members are interested in PCOR. A high-quality training program would fill a current methodological research gap. This assessment identified the topics and formats desired and can be used to develop targeted training to enhance meaningful PCOR in CF.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Godfrey EM, Kazmerski TM, Brown G, Thayer E, Mentch L, Pam M, Al Achkar M

Educational Needs and Preferences for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research in the Cystic Fibrosis Community: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(3):e24302

DOI: 10.2196/24302

PMID: 33661127

PMCID: 7974760

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.