Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Aug 28, 2020
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 28, 2020 - Sep 6, 2020
Date Accepted: Oct 25, 2020
Date Submitted to PubMed: Oct 27, 2020
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Automated Smart Home Assessment to Support Pain Management: Multiple Methods Analysis

Fritz RL, Wilson M, Dermody G, Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Cook DJ

Automated Smart Home Assessment to Support Pain Management: Multiple Methods Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(11):e23943

DOI: 10.2196/23943

PMID: 33105099

PMCID: 7679205

Automated Smart Home Assessment to Support Pain Management: Multiple Methods

  • Roschelle L Fritz; 
  • Marian Wilson; 
  • Gordana Dermody; 
  • Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe; 
  • Diane J Cook

ABSTRACT

Background:

Poorly managed pain can lead to addiction, depression, suicide, worsening health, and increased use of health services. Most pain assessments occur in clinical settings, far removed from patients’ natural environment. Advances in smart home technology can, potentially, allow observation of pain in the home setting. Smart homes can be trained to recognize human behaviors and may be useful for quantifying functional pain interference thereby creating new ways of assessing pain and supporting people with pain who are living at home.

Objective:

To determine if a health-assistive smart home can detect pain-related behaviors to perform automated assessment and support intervention.

Methods:

A preliminary retrospective study was nested in a larger longitudinal smart home study. Archived ambient sensor and weekly nursing health assessment data from 11 independent older adults reporting pain across 1-2 years were co-analyzed. Two nurses using qualitative methods interpreted 27 unique pain events (acute, flare, chronic) represented in sensor-based data and illuminated 13 clinically-relevant associated behaviors. Data were used to train a machine learning model to recognize pain-related behaviors. The model extracted 550 behavioral markers for each sensor-based data segment. These were treated as both a binary classification problem (event, control) and a regression problem.

Results:

Qualitative analysis revealed six pain-related behavioral themes. Quantitative results were classified using a clinician-guided random forest technique which yielded a classification accuracy of 0.70, a sensitivity of 0.72, a specificity of 0.69, an area under the ROC curve of 0.756, and an area under the PRC curve of 0.777. The regression formulation achieved moderate correlation with r=0.42. Without clinician guidance, using standard anomaly detection techniques, an accuracy of only 0.16 was achieved.

Conclusions:

Findings reveal that a pain-assessing smart home may viably support pain management. Utilizing clinicians’ real-world knowledge when developing machine learning models for healthcare delivery could improve the model’s performance. A larger study is warranted to improve model performance. Automated assessment may improve health outcomes for persons with chronic pain by facilitating timely contact with the healthcare team.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Fritz RL, Wilson M, Dermody G, Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Cook DJ

Automated Smart Home Assessment to Support Pain Management: Multiple Methods Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(11):e23943

DOI: 10.2196/23943

PMID: 33105099

PMCID: 7679205

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.