Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Dermatology

Date Submitted: Aug 20, 2020
Date Accepted: Oct 28, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Assessment of Altmetrics and PlumX Metrics Scoring as Mechanisms to Evaluate the Top 100 Trending Hidradenitis Suppurativa Articles on Social Media: Cross-Sectional Study

Wei C, Fong A, Quan T, Gupta P, Friedman A

Assessment of Altmetrics and PlumX Metrics Scoring as Mechanisms to Evaluate the Top 100 Trending Hidradenitis Suppurativa Articles on Social Media: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Dermatol 2020;3(1):e23724

DOI: 10.2196/23724

Assessment of Altmetric and PlumX metrics scoring as mechanisms to evaluate the top 100 Trending Hidradenitis Suppurativa information on social media: : A Cross-Sectional Analysis

  • Chapman Wei; 
  • Aaron Fong; 
  • Theodore Quan; 
  • Puneet Gupta; 
  • Adam Friedman

ABSTRACT

Background:

Dermatologists are increasingly utilizing social media platforms to disseminate scientific information. New tools, such as Altmetrics and PlumX metrics, have been made available to rapidly capture the level of scientific article dissemination across social media platforms. However, no studies have been performed to assess the level of scientific article dissemination across social media regarding hidradenitis suppurativa, a disease that is still currently not well understood.

Objective:

The aim of our study was to evaluate the utility of Altmetrics and PlumX metrics by characterizing the top 100 ‘trending’ hidradenitis suppurativa articles in the Altmetric database by Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) and PlumX scores.

Methods:

Altmetric data components of the top 100 hidradenitis suppurativa articles were extracted and from the Altmetric database. Article citation-count was found using Web-of-Science. PlumX Weighted Impact scores for each article were collected from the Scopus database. Journal title, open-access status, article type, and study design of original articles were assessed. Additionally, AAS, PlumX scores, and citation-counts were log-transformed and adjusted by +1 for linear regression, and Spearman correlation coefficients were utilized to determine correlations.

Results:

Most of the top 100 ‘trending’ hidradenitis suppurativa articles were published in JAMA Dermatology (27%; Table 1). Median AAS, PlumX score, and citation-count were 25.5, 3.7, and 10.5 respectively. The most mentions of the social media platforms came from Twitter. Although no correlation was observed between citation-count and AAS (r2 = .019; P = .17), positive correlation was observed between citation-count and PlumX score (r2 = .469; P < .001).

Conclusions:

Our research demonstrates that citation-count is not correlated with AAS, but strongly correlated with PlumX scores regarding hidradenitis suppurativa articles at this point in time. With the continual increase of social media usage by medical professionals and researchers, this study can help investigators understand the best way to captivate their audience.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wei C, Fong A, Quan T, Gupta P, Friedman A

Assessment of Altmetrics and PlumX Metrics Scoring as Mechanisms to Evaluate the Top 100 Trending Hidradenitis Suppurativa Articles on Social Media: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Dermatol 2020;3(1):e23724

DOI: 10.2196/23724

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.