Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Oct 7, 2020
Date Accepted: Nov 19, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Young Adults’ Use of Different Social Media Platforms for Health Information: Insights From Web-Based Conversations

Lim M, Molenaar A, Brennan L, Reid M, McCaffrey T

Young Adults’ Use of Different Social Media Platforms for Health Information: Insights From Web-Based Conversations

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(1):e23656

DOI: 10.2196/23656

PMID: 35040796

PMCID: 8808344

Young adults use of different social media platforms for health information: insights from online conversations

  • Megan Lim; 
  • Annika Molenaar; 
  • Linda Brennan; 
  • Mike Reid; 
  • Tracy McCaffrey

ABSTRACT

Background:

Social media-delivered health promotion has met with limited uptake and effectiveness among young adults. Understanding of how young adults are interacting with existing social media platforms for health might provide insight for future health promotion interventions.

Objective:

This paper aims to describe how young adults interact with different social media platforms for health and health information.

Methods:

We used an online conversation methodology to collect data from 165 young adults aged 18-24. Participants joined in an extended conversation with moderators and other participants about health and social media. They were prompted to discuss how they find health information, how they use different social media platforms, and how they evaluate the trustworthiness of information. A thematic qualitative analysis was applied to the data.

Results:

Young adults spent a lot of time scrolling through Facebook newsfeeds, which often resulted in seeing health-related content, either from their friends, news sources or advertisements. Some actively sought out information about specific health areas through joining groups or following relevant pages. YouTube was considered a useful source to learn about everything and was often the go to when searching for information or advice (after Google). Young adults found the video format easy to learn from. They stated they could identify accurate YouTube health content by cross-checking multiple videos, by feeling that the presenter was ‘real’ and relatable, or just through instinctively judging a video's credibility. Instagram was a source of health and wellness inspiration from those whose lives were dedicated to healthy lifestyles and fitness. Twitter, Tumblr, and Snapchat were rarely used for health information.

Conclusions:

Most young adults obtain some health information from social media, both actively and through passive exposure. Participants indicated looking to social media influencers for health and lifestyle inspiration and judged the credibility of sources by appearances and instinct. Health experts should try to use the channels in the way that young adults already use them; use relatable role models on Instagram and YouTube, eye-catching headlines and support groups on Facebook, and easy to follow instruction videos via YouTube.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lim M, Molenaar A, Brennan L, Reid M, McCaffrey T

Young Adults’ Use of Different Social Media Platforms for Health Information: Insights From Web-Based Conversations

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(1):e23656

DOI: 10.2196/23656

PMID: 35040796

PMCID: 8808344

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.