Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Aug 17, 2020
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 16, 2020 - Oct 11, 2020
Date Accepted: Jun 21, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Videoconferencing for Home Care Delivery in Japan: Observational Study

Miyatake H, Kosaka M, Arita S, Tsunetoshi C, Masunaga H, Kotera Y, Nishikawa Y, Ozaki A, Beniya H

Videoconferencing for Home Care Delivery in Japan: Observational Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(9):e23539

DOI: 10.2196/23539

PMID: 34468333

PMCID: 8444039

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Video conferencing for home care delivery in Japan and its emerging implications for the COVID-19 era: observational study

  • Hirotomo Miyatake; 
  • Makoto Kosaka; 
  • Satoshi Arita; 
  • Chie Tsunetoshi; 
  • Hidehisa Masunaga; 
  • Yasuhiro Kotera; 
  • Yoshitaka Nishikawa; 
  • Akihiko Ozaki; 
  • Hiroyuki Beniya

ABSTRACT

Background:

Telemedicine has been increasingly used in many healthcare fields including home care, where patients receive medical care at home. Due to the current COVID19 crisis, the value of telemedicine via video-conferencing (VC) is more recognized allowing immobile patients to continue to receive care. Despite the increased use, the efficacy of telemedicine in the home care settings in Japan remains to be appraised.

Objective:

The purpose of this study is to identify the use and impacts of telemedicine in home care delivery in Japan.

Methods:

Retrospective observational study was employed using patient and other administrative records stored in our home care clinic. We considered patients who were involved in VC with our home care physicians and telepresenters (medical assistant who is present with the patient during a telemedicine session) nearby the patients during 2018 and 2019. We extracted sociodemographic data of the patients and the process of unplanned video conferences and descriptively illustrated some informative cases.

Results:

In a home care clinic in Japan, VC was conducted in 17 cases (involving 14 patients) over the 2-year period. Of all the cases, two (11.8%) required emergency transfers and were hospitalized. In the remaining 15 cases, 12 were thought to need medications or go to a clinic for consultation, while the remaining three were ordered to rest. The symptoms subsequently improved in 14 cases, and only one patient was later hospitalized due to the development of pneumonia from an upper respiratory infection.

Conclusions:

Consultations via VC were generally as safe and effective as the face-to-face. Telemedicine was deemed effective for assessing the patients’ conditions in the home care setting in situations where home visits cannot be carried out.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Miyatake H, Kosaka M, Arita S, Tsunetoshi C, Masunaga H, Kotera Y, Nishikawa Y, Ozaki A, Beniya H

Videoconferencing for Home Care Delivery in Japan: Observational Study

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(9):e23539

DOI: 10.2196/23539

PMID: 34468333

PMCID: 8444039

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.