Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Aug 3, 2020
Date Accepted: Apr 13, 2021
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
A provider-facing educational health website on transitioning children and youth with special health care needs from pediatric to adult care: a mixed-methods, user engaged, usability study.
ABSTRACT
Youth with Special Health Care Needs (YSHCN) have chronic physical, developmental, behavioral, or emotional conditions that require health care and other services beyond typical utilization. We evaluated, using the concurrent think aloud (CTA) method , the Website Evaluation Questionnaire (WEQ), a task performance analysis, and Van Den Haak et als’ problem relevance metric, a care transition tool for providers of YSHCN. This tool, the Texas Transition Toolkit (T3) supports medical home providers by providing: a “one-stop-shop” to research literature on transition care, a catalog of relevant tools for providers to assess their organization or the YSHCN and families they work with, and guides for developing a transition program in their medical home. Our mixed-methods deep dive into the usability and functionality of the T3 focused on ten end-users from one medical home in Texas. While the T3 was well-received by end users, our analyses identified areas of concern regarding the application. End-users reported the most difficulty in two areas of functionality and usability: inefficient search function and navigation characteristics. This was reflected in both the CTA trial and the WEQ, and supported by the task performance and relevance analyses. Participants reported low satisfaction with search (75.3%) and navigation dimensions (ease of use=75.7%; hyperlinks=78%; and structure=79%), relatively high number of search and navigation related problems (n=21, or 67.75% of the total problems detected1), and low tasks completion for tasks involving finding tools (70%) which requires searching and navigation. The problems identified around search and navigation functionality were also assessed as ‘relevant’. Each of these areas of analyses triangulate on search and navigation issues, suggesting a robustness of results. Results from the usability trial provided a road map for optimizing the T3, and highlighted the importance of evaluating eHealth technologies with end users.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.