Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jul 25, 2020
Date Accepted: Mar 29, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Mar 30, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparing the Efficacies of Telemedicine and Standard Prenatal Care on Blood Glucose Control in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Randomized Controlled Trial

Tian Y, Zhang S, Huang F, Ma L

Comparing the Efficacies of Telemedicine and Standard Prenatal Care on Blood Glucose Control in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(5):e22881

DOI: 10.2196/22881

PMID: 33783365

PMCID: 8188321

Comparing the blood glucose control efficacy of telemedicine with that of standard prenatal care in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial

  • Ying Tian; 
  • Suhan Zhang; 
  • Feiling Huang; 
  • Liangkun Ma

ABSTRACT

Background:

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can usually be well controlled by health education and lifestyle management, expecting a better pregnancy outcome. However, standard clinical prenatal care, which consists of clinic visits every two weeks, may not give full play to the effects of GDM management. Telemedicine shows potential to fill this gap.

Objective:

We performed a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to investigate whether health education and lifestyle management provided through a WeChat group chat was more effective in controlling blood glucose (BG) than standard clinical prenatal care among women with GDM.

Methods:

Women with GDM diagnosed by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between 23 and 30+6 gestational weeks were randomized to a WeChat group chat-based BG management group or a routine clinical prenatal care group. The primary outcome was the change in the glycemic qualification rate during the follow-up period in both groups. The second outcome was pregnancy outcomes.

Results:

A total of 309 women with GDM participated in the trial, with 162 women randomized to the control group and 147 to the intervention group. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were found between the control and intervention groups. Participants were divided into four stages (Group Ⅰ- Group Ⅳ) according to gestational weeks at enrollment for further analysis. The glycemic qualification rate of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group at nearly all time points in Group Ⅰ- Group Ⅲ, yet the differences were not significant in most cases. This was not observed in Group IV. The glycemic qualification rate gradually increased as gestational weeks progressed in both groups, regardless of the intervention method. None of the pregnancy outcomes measured were significantly different between the control and intervention groups.

Conclusions:

This multicenter randomized trial that assessed noninsulin-dependent GDM women demonstrated that additional instant messaging platforms, such as WeChat, used for health education and lifestyle intervention in China tend to be more effective for BG control than only standard clinical prenatal care. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03748576


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tian Y, Zhang S, Huang F, Ma L

Comparing the Efficacies of Telemedicine and Standard Prenatal Care on Blood Glucose Control in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(5):e22881

DOI: 10.2196/22881

PMID: 33783365

PMCID: 8188321

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.