Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Jul 18, 2020
Date Accepted: Apr 19, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Advantages and Challenges in Using Telehealth for Home-Based Palliative Care: Protocol for a Systematic Mixed Studies Review

Steindal SA, Nes AAG, Godskesen TE, Lind S, Dhle A, Winger A, Österlind J, Pettersen FS, Holmen H, Klarare A

Advantages and Challenges in Using Telehealth for Home-Based Palliative Care: Protocol for a Systematic Mixed Studies Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2021;10(5):e22626

DOI: 10.2196/22626

PMID: 34018964

PMCID: 8178736

Advantages and challenges in using telehealth for home-based palliative care: A systematic mixed studies review

  • Simen A Steindal; 
  • Andréa Aparecida Goncalves Nes; 
  • Tove E. Godskesen; 
  • Susanne Lind; 
  • Alfhild Dhle; 
  • Anette Winger; 
  • Jane Österlind; 
  • Fredrik Solvang Pettersen; 
  • Heidi Holmen; 
  • Anna Klarare

ABSTRACT

Background:

Due to the increasing number of people in need of palliative care services and the current health care professional workforce strain, providing equitable, quality palliative care has become a challenge. Telehealth could be an innovative approach to palliative care delivery, enabling patients to spend more time or even remain at home, if they wish, throughout the illness trajectory. However, no previous systematic mixed studies reviews have synthesized evidence on patients’ experiences of the advantages and challenges of telehealth for home-based palliative care.

Objective:

The aim of this systematic mixed studies review is to critically appraise and synthesize findings from studies that investigated patients’ use of telehealth in home-based palliative care with a focus on the advantages and challenges experienced by the patients.

Methods:

This article describes the protocol for a systematic mixed studies review with a convergent design. The reporting will be guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement. A systematic search was performed in eight databases for studies published from January 2010 to June 2020. The search will be updated in 2021. Pairs of authors will independently assess eligibility, extract data and assess methodological quality. The data will then be analyzed using thematic synthesis.

Results:

We described the rationale and design of a systematic mixed studies review. The database searches were performed on June 25, 2020. Assessment of eligibility and further steps have not yet been performed. Results are anticipated by August 2021.

Conclusions:

Following the ethos of patient-centered palliative care, this systematic mixed studies review could contribute recommendations for practice and policy enabling the development of telehealth applications and services that align with patients’ preferences and needs when using telehealth applications and services at home.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Steindal SA, Nes AAG, Godskesen TE, Lind S, Dhle A, Winger A, Österlind J, Pettersen FS, Holmen H, Klarare A

Advantages and Challenges in Using Telehealth for Home-Based Palliative Care: Protocol for a Systematic Mixed Studies Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2021;10(5):e22626

DOI: 10.2196/22626

PMID: 34018964

PMCID: 8178736

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.