Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jul 13, 2020
Date Accepted: Dec 12, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Accuracy of Smart Scales on Weight and Body Composition: Observational Study

Frija-Masson J, Mullaert J, Vidal-Petiot E, Pons Kerjean N, Flamant M, D'Ortho MP

Accuracy of Smart Scales on Weight and Body Composition: Observational Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(4):e22487

DOI: 10.2196/22487

PMID: 33929337

PMCID: 8122302

Accuracy of three smart scales for weight and body composition in adults

  • Justine Frija-Masson; 
  • Jimmy Mullaert; 
  • Emmanuelle Vidal-Petiot; 
  • Nathalie Pons Kerjean; 
  • Martin Flamant; 
  • Marie-Pia D'Ortho

ABSTRACT

Background:

Smart scales are increasingly used at home by patients to monitor their body weight and body composition, but their accuracy has not often been documented.

Objective:

To determine the accuracy of three commercially available smart scales for weight and body composition, compared to DEXA as gold standard.

Methods:

We designed a cross-sectional study in patients addressed for DEXA in a physiology unit in a tertiary hospital in France. We consecutively included adult patients addressed for DEXA. There were no exclusion criteria except patient declining to participate. Patients were weighed with one smart scale immediately after DEXA. Three different scales were compared (Téfal Body Partner, Teraillon dietpack, Nokia Withings Body Cardio). We determined absolute error between gold-standard values obtained from DEXA and from smart scales for body mass, fat mass and lean mass.

Results:

The sample for analysis included 53, 52 and 48 patients for each of the three tested smart scales respectively. The median absolute error for body weight was 0.3kg (IQR -0.1;0.7), 0.0kg (IQR -0.4;0.3) and 0.25 kg (IQR -0.10; 0.52) respectively. For fat mass, absolute errors were -2.2kg (IQR -5.8;1.3), -4.4kg (IQR -6.6;0.0) and -3.7kg (IQR -8.0;0.28) respectively. For muscular mass, absolute errors were -2.2kg (IQR -5.8;1.3), -4.4kg (IQR -6.6; 0.0) and -3.65kg (IQR -8.03;0.28) respectively. Factors associated with fat mass measurement error were weight for scales 1 and 2 (P=0.03 and P<.001 respectively), BMI for scales 1 and 2 (P=0.034 and P<.001), body fat for scale 1 (P<.001) and muscular and bone mass for scale 2 (P<.001 for both). Factors associated with muscular mass error were weight and BMI for scale 1 (P<.001 and P=.004), body fat for scales 1 and 2 (P<.001 for both) and muscular and bone mass for scale 2 (P<.001 and P=.002 respectively).

Conclusions:

Smart scale are not accurate for body composition and should not replace DEXA in patient care. Clinical Trial: National Clinical Trials 03803098


 Citation

Please cite as:

Frija-Masson J, Mullaert J, Vidal-Petiot E, Pons Kerjean N, Flamant M, D'Ortho MP

Accuracy of Smart Scales on Weight and Body Composition: Observational Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(4):e22487

DOI: 10.2196/22487

PMID: 33929337

PMCID: 8122302

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.