Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Jul 1, 2020
Date Accepted: Dec 15, 2020
Date Submitted to PubMed: Dec 15, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Disparities in Care Outcomes in Atlanta Between Black and White Men Who Have Sex With Men Living With HIV: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study (Engage[men]t)

Sullivan P, Taussig J, Valentine-Graves M, Luisi N, Del Rio C, Jones J, Millett G, Rosenberg ES, Stephenson R, Kelley C

Disparities in Care Outcomes in Atlanta Between Black and White Men Who Have Sex With Men Living With HIV: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study (Engage[men]t)

JMIR Res Protoc 2021;10(2):e21985

DOI: 10.2196/21985

PMID: 33320821

PMCID: 7943338

The Engage[men]t Study: Protocol for a prospective cohort study of Black and White men who have sex with men living with HIV in Atlanta, Georgia to examine Black/White disparities in care outcomes

  • Patrick Sullivan; 
  • Jennifer Taussig; 
  • Mariah Valentine-Graves; 
  • Nicole Luisi; 
  • Carlos Del Rio; 
  • Jeb Jones; 
  • Greg Millett; 
  • Eli S Rosenberg; 
  • Rob Stephenson; 
  • Colleen Kelley

ABSTRACT

Background:

The US HIV epidemic is driven by infections in men who have sex with men (MSM) and characterized by profound disparities in HIV prevalence and outcomes for Black Americans. Black MSM living with HIV are reported to have worse care outcomes than other MSM, but the reasons for these health inequities are not clear. We planned a prospective observational cohort study to help understand the reasons for worse HIV care outcomes for Black versus white MSM in Atlanta.

Objective:

Identify individual, dyadic, network, neighborhood and structural factors that explain Black/white disparities in HIV viral suppression for MSM living with HIV in Atlanta.

Methods:

Four hundred MSM (200 Black, 200 white) living with HIV were enrolled in a prospective cohort study with in-person visits and viral suppression assessments at baseline, 12 and 24 months, additional surveys of care and risk behaviors at 3, 6, and 18 months, analysis of care received outside the study through public health reporting, and qualitative interviews for participants who experienced sentinel health events (e.g., loss of viral suppression) during the study. The study is based on Bronfenbrenner’s socioecological theoretical model.

Results:

Four hundred MSM were enrolled between MM YYYY and MM YYYY in Atlanta. Followup was completed in MM YYYY; final study retention was 80% at 12 months.

Conclusions:

Health disparities for Black MSM are hypothesized to be driven by structural racism and barriers to care. Observational studies are important to document and quantify the specific factors within the socioecological framework that account for disparities in viral suppression. In the meantime, it is also critical to push for steps to improve access to care, including Medicaid expansion in Southern states, including Georgia, which have not yet moved to expand Medicaid. Clinical Trial: None


 Citation

Please cite as:

Sullivan P, Taussig J, Valentine-Graves M, Luisi N, Del Rio C, Jones J, Millett G, Rosenberg ES, Stephenson R, Kelley C

Disparities in Care Outcomes in Atlanta Between Black and White Men Who Have Sex With Men Living With HIV: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study (Engage[men]t)

JMIR Res Protoc 2021;10(2):e21985

DOI: 10.2196/21985

PMID: 33320821

PMCID: 7943338

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.