Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Participatory Medicine

Date Submitted: Jun 29, 2020
Date Accepted: Dec 24, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patient Experience and Predictors of Improvement in a Group Behavioral and Educational Intervention for Individuals With Diabetes and Serious Mental Illness: Mixed Methods Case Study

Schnitzer K, Cather C, Zvonar V, Dechert A, Plummer R, Lowman K, Pachas G, Potter K, Evins AE

Patient Experience and Predictors of Improvement in a Group Behavioral and Educational Intervention for Individuals With Diabetes and Serious Mental Illness: Mixed Methods Case Study

J Particip Med 2021;13(1):e21934

DOI: 10.2196/21934

PMID: 33576747

PMCID: 7910121

Patient experience and predictors of improvement in a group behavioral and educational intervention for individuals with diabetes and serious mental illness: a mixed methods case study

  • Kristina Schnitzer; 
  • Corrine Cather; 
  • Vanya Zvonar; 
  • Alyson Dechert; 
  • Rachel Plummer; 
  • Kelsey Lowman; 
  • Gladys Pachas; 
  • Kevin Potter; 
  • Anne Eden Evins

ABSTRACT

Background:

Participation in a 16-week, reverse-integrated care, group behavioral and educational intervention for individuals with diabetes and serious mental illness was associated with improved glycemic control (HbA1C) and body mass index (BMI).

Objective:

Here we aimed to identify elements of patient experience and evaluate predictors of outcome.

Methods:

In order to better understand key components of the intervention, quantitative and qualitative data were collected utilizing a mixed methods case study framework. Mixed effects modeling was performed to identify predictors of improved HbA1C and BMI. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 24/35 (69%) of those who attended one or more group sessions and 9/25 (36%) of those who consented but attended no sessions. Independent qualitative and quantitative analytics were integrated thematically.

Results:

No factors tested were significantly associated with improved HbA1C. Improved diabetes knowledge was associated with reduced BMI (P=0.003). Qualitative interviews identified health-related knowledge gains and application to real world situations, positive reinforcement by group leaders and peers, accountability for goals, group support, and increased confidence in the ability to prioritize health goals as factors contributing to success of the behavioral intervention from the participants’ perspective.

Conclusions:

This mixed methods analysis supports further study of a combined educational and behavioral intervention for diabetes self-management in adults with diabetes and serious mental illness in which improved diabetes knowledge was associated with weight loss. Participants highlighted the value of the group model as well as positive reinforcement, accountability, and real-world application of knowledge gained for improving health related knowledge, behavior, and outcomes.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Schnitzer K, Cather C, Zvonar V, Dechert A, Plummer R, Lowman K, Pachas G, Potter K, Evins AE

Patient Experience and Predictors of Improvement in a Group Behavioral and Educational Intervention for Individuals With Diabetes and Serious Mental Illness: Mixed Methods Case Study

J Particip Med 2021;13(1):e21934

DOI: 10.2196/21934

PMID: 33576747

PMCID: 7910121

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.