Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jun 28, 2020
Date Accepted: Jan 22, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effectiveness of Interactive Tools in Online Health Care Communities: Social Exchange Theory Perspective

Ren D, Ma B 2nd

Effectiveness of Interactive Tools in Online Health Care Communities: Social Exchange Theory Perspective

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(3):e21892

DOI: 10.2196/21892

PMID: 33709940

PMCID: 7998319

Effectiveness of Interactive Tools in Online Health-care Communities: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective

  • Dixuan Ren; 
  • Baolong Ma 2nd

ABSTRACT

Background:

Online health consultation service is of great significance for improving medical service quality and improving doctor-patient relationship. Doctors in China regularly interact with their patients (or, at least, those who make inquiries) online rather than primarily in-person. The prosperity of the platform depends on the continuous participation and efforts of doctors, and obtaining satisfactory economic returns is an important motivation for doctors' continuous participation.

Objective:

This study is of guiding significance to platform service providers, doctors and patients in the OHCs.

Methods:

Doctor's participation behavior is a process in which professional capital participates in social exchange for economic return. Based on social exchange theory, this paper establishes an online effort exchange model for doctors. From March 5, 2019, the data of doctors treating five diseases of hepatitis B, diabetes, rhinitis, cervical spondylosis and lung cancer in Beijing were collected on the website of good doctor. The data collection lasted for 10 days, involving 253 doctors. We analyzed quantitative data by SPSS version 20 using descriptive and logistic regression analysis techniques.

Results:

Research shows that the number of doctors’ answers has a significant positive impact on income, and the number of topic groups is strongly affected by the degree of disease privacy. When the degree of disease privacy increases, the influence of the number of topic set by doctors on the income of online consultation turns from negative correlation to positive correlation, indicating that when patients consult diseases with low degree of privacy, the more topics, the lower the doctor income; while when patients consult diseases with high degree of privacy, the more topics, the higher the income.

Conclusions:

This study is of guiding significance to platform service providers, doctors and patients in the OHCs. The online health-care platform should provide more and better online doctor-patient interaction tools for showing doctors’ efforts through policy tilt and system design; for privacy diseases, doctors who devote more energy and time to topic group setting have more advantages and are more likely to get better incomes; patients who receive online health-care services can choose doctors who reply timely and carefully instead of pursuing doctors who have high status. Clinical Trial: none


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ren D, Ma B 2nd

Effectiveness of Interactive Tools in Online Health Care Communities: Social Exchange Theory Perspective

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(3):e21892

DOI: 10.2196/21892

PMID: 33709940

PMCID: 7998319

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.