Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jun 25, 2020
Date Accepted: Jan 8, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Attitudes of General Practitioners Toward Prescription of Mobile Health Apps: Qualitative Study

Sarradon-Eck A, Bouchez T, Auroy L, Schuers M, Darmon D

Attitudes of General Practitioners Toward Prescription of Mobile Health Apps: Qualitative Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(3):e21795

DOI: 10.2196/21795

PMID: 33661123

PMCID: 7974757

GPs’ attitudes towards prescription of mHealth apps: an empirically grounded typology

  • Aline Sarradon-Eck; 
  • Tiphanie Bouchez; 
  • Lola Auroy; 
  • Matthieu Schuers; 
  • David Darmon

ABSTRACT

Background:

mHealth apps could be a means of empowering patients especially in the case of multimorbidity that complexifies patients’ care needs. Little is known so far about the perceived value of mHealth by general practitioners (GPs), and GPs’ fears and resistance to patient use of mHealth apps.

Objective:

The aim of our qualitative study was to investigate French GPs’ perceptions and expectations of mHealth apps aimed towards patients.

Methods:

Thirty-five GPs were interviewed individually (n=19) or in a discussion group (n=16). All participants were in private practice. A qualitative analysis of each interview and focus group was conducted using the Grounded Theory coding method. Based on a sociological approach, an empirical typology was then drawn of the attitude of French GPs’ towards the prescription of mobile health apps.

Results:

The themes generated from the interviews allow us to identify two empirical dimensions of the GPs concerns towards mHealth apps: 1) the value of the apps for patients (from high to low); 2) the value for the medical work (from high to low). These concerns can be organized into three broad categories of attitudes adopted by the GPs: digital engagement, patient protection, doctor protection. These three types of highlighted attitudes are not closed “boxes”. Indeed, each GP interviewed could have an ambivalent discourse with regard to specific aspects of the prescription of mHealth apps or the patients’ use of apps.

Conclusions:

A deep understanding of both expectations and fears of GPs is essential to motivate them to recommend mobile health apps to their patients. The study’s results show a need to provide appropriate education and training in order to enhance digital skills of GPs. Certification of the apps by an independent authority should be encouraged to reassure physicians over ethical and data security issues. Our results highlight the need to overcome technical issues like interoperability between data collection and medical records in order to limit the disruption of the medical work by the data flow.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Sarradon-Eck A, Bouchez T, Auroy L, Schuers M, Darmon D

Attitudes of General Practitioners Toward Prescription of Mobile Health Apps: Qualitative Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(3):e21795

DOI: 10.2196/21795

PMID: 33661123

PMCID: 7974757

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.