Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jun 21, 2020
Date Accepted: May 12, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: May 12, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Predictors of Health Information–Seeking Behavior: Systematic Literature Review and Network Analysis

Mirzaei A, Aslani P, Luca EJ, Schneider CR

Predictors of Health Information–Seeking Behavior: Systematic Literature Review and Network Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(7):e21680

DOI: 10.2196/21680

PMID: 33979776

PMCID: 8285748

Predictors of Health Information Seeking Behavior: A Systematic Review and Network Analysis

  • Ardalan Mirzaei; 
  • Parisa Aslani; 
  • Edward Joseph Luca; 
  • Carl Richard Schneider

ABSTRACT

Background:

People engage in health information seeking behavior (HISB) to support health outcomes. Being able to predict a person’s behavior can inform the development of interventions to guide effective health information seeking. Obtaining a comprehensive list of the predictors of HISB through a systematic search of the literature and exploring the inter-relationship of these predictors are important first steps in this process.

Objective:

This study aimed to; identify significant predictors of health information seeking behavior (HISB) in the primary literature; develop a common taxonomy for predictors of HISB; and identify the evolution of the HISB research field.

Methods:

A systematic search of PsycINFO and Scopus was conducted for all years up to and including 10/12/2019. Quantitative studies identifying significant predictors of HISB were included. Information seeking was defined broadly and not restricted to any one source of health information. Data extraction of the significant predictors was performed by two authors. A network analysis was conducted to observe relationships between predictors over time.

Results:

A total of 6,402 articles were retrieved, and after screening, 300 studies were retained for analysis. A total of 1,413 significant predictors were identified. These predictors were categorized into 67 predictor clusters. The most central predictors were age, education, gender, health condition and financial income. Over time, the inter-relationship of predictors in the network became denser, with the growth of new predictor grouping reaching saturation (1 new predictor identified) in the past 7 years, despite increasing publication rates.

Conclusions:

A common taxonomy was developed, classifying 67 significant predictors of HISB. A novel temporal network was developed to track the evolution of research in HISB field, showing a maturation of new predictor terms and an increase in primary studies reporting multiple significant predictors of HISB. HISB research literature has experienced evolution with decreased characterization of novel predictors of HISB over time. A parallel increase in the complexity of predicting HISB has been identified with an increase in literature describing multiple significant predictors of HISB.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Mirzaei A, Aslani P, Luca EJ, Schneider CR

Predictors of Health Information–Seeking Behavior: Systematic Literature Review and Network Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(7):e21680

DOI: 10.2196/21680

PMID: 33979776

PMCID: 8285748

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.