Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Jun 12, 2020
Date Accepted: Sep 4, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Web-Based Dementia Caregiver Education From the Clinician’s Perspective: Qualitative Study

Levinson AJ, Ayers S, Butler L, Papaioannou A, Marr S, Sztramko R

Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Web-Based Dementia Caregiver Education From the Clinician’s Perspective: Qualitative Study

JMIR Aging 2020;3(2):e21264

DOI: 10.2196/21264

PMID: 33006563

PMCID: 7568210

Barriers and facilitators to implementing web-based dementia caregiver education from the clinician's perspective: A qualitative study

  • Anthony J Levinson; 
  • Stephanie Ayers; 
  • Lianna Butler; 
  • Alexandra Papaioannou; 
  • Sharon Marr; 
  • Richard Sztramko

ABSTRACT

Background:

Internet-based dementia caregiver interventions have been shown to be effective for a range of caregiver outcomes, yet little is known about how best to implement them. We developed iGeriCare, an evidence-based, multimedia, online educational resource for family caregivers of people living with dementia.

Objective:

The objectives of this study were to get feedback and opinions from experts and clinicians involved in dementia care and caregiver education about 1) iGeriCare, and 2) barriers and facilitators to implementing an online caregiver program.

Methods:

We performed semi-structured interviews with individuals who had a role in dementia care/caregiver education in several key stakeholder settings in Southern Ontario, Canada. We queried participants’ perceptions of iGeriCare, caregiver education, the implementation process and their experience with facilitators and barriers. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using a grounded theory approach. The themes that emerged were organized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Results:

Twelve participants from a range of disciplines described their perceptions of iGeriCare, and identified barriers and facilitators to implementation of the intervention. The intervention was generally perceived as a high-quality resource for caregiver education and support, with many stakeholders highlighting the relative advantage of a web-based format. The intervention was seen to meet dementia caregiver needs, partially due to its flexibility, accessibility and compatibility within existing clinical workflows. Additionally, the intervention helps to overcome time constraints for both caregivers and clinicians.

Conclusions:

Study findings indicate a generally positive response for the use of internet-based interventions for dementia caregiver education. Results suggest that iGeriCare may be a useful clinical resource to complement traditional face-to-face and print material caregiver education. More comprehensive studies are required to identify the effectiveness and longevity of online caregiver education interventions, and continue to better understand barriers and facilitators with respect to the implementation of technology-enhanced caregiver educational interventions in various healthcare settings.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Levinson AJ, Ayers S, Butler L, Papaioannou A, Marr S, Sztramko R

Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Web-Based Dementia Caregiver Education From the Clinician’s Perspective: Qualitative Study

JMIR Aging 2020;3(2):e21264

DOI: 10.2196/21264

PMID: 33006563

PMCID: 7568210

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.