Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: May 17, 2020
Date Accepted: Jul 6, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Utilization Barriers and Medical Outcomes Commensurate With the Use of Telehealth Among Older Adults: Systematic Review

Kruse C, Fohn J, Wilson N, Nunez_Patlin E, Zipp S, Mileski M

Utilization Barriers and Medical Outcomes Commensurate With the Use of Telehealth Among Older Adults: Systematic Review

JMIR Med Inform 2020;8(8):e20359

DOI: 10.2196/20359

PMID: 32784177

PMCID: 7450384

Barriers to Utilizing and Medical Outcomes Commensurate with the Use of Telehealth Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review

  • Clemens Kruse; 
  • Joanna Fohn; 
  • Nakia Wilson; 
  • Evangelina Nunez_Patlin; 
  • Stephanie Zipp; 
  • Michael Mileski

ABSTRACT

Background:

Background:

Rising telehealth capabilities and improving access to older adults can aid in improving health outcomes and quality of life indicators. Telehealth is not being used ubiquitously, at the present.

Objective:

This review seeks to identify the barriers that prevent ubiquitous use as well as ways in which telehealth improves health outcomes and quality of life indicators for older adults.

Methods:

This systematic review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Kruse protocol and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Reviewers queried four research databases: The Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, and Embase (Science Direct) research databases. Reviewers analyzed 64 articles, performed a narrative analysis to identify themes, and identified barriers and reports of health outcomes and quality of life indicators found in the literature.

Results:

Reviewers analyzed 57 studies across five interventions of telehealth: eHealth, mHealth, tele-monitoring, telecare (phone), and telemedicine video calls. Reviewers identified fourteen themes for barriers: The most common of which were technical literacy (25/144 occurrences, 17%), lack of desire (19/144 occurrences, 13%), and cost (11/144 occurrences, 8%). Reviewers identified thirteen medical outcomes associated with telehealth intervention: The most common of which were decrease in psychological stress (21/118 occurrences, 18%), increase in autonomy (18/118 occurrences, 15%) and increase in cognitive ability (11/118 occurrences, 9%). Some articles did not report medical outcomes (18/57, 32%) and some did not report barriers (19/57, 33%).

Conclusions:

The literature suggests the elimination of barriers could increase the prevalence of telehealth use by older adults. By increasing use of telehealth, proximity to care is no longer an issue for access, thereby reaching the population with more chronic conditions and mobility restrictions. Future research should be conducted on methods for personalizing telehealth in older adults before implementation. Clinical Trial: This review was registered with PROSPERO.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kruse C, Fohn J, Wilson N, Nunez_Patlin E, Zipp S, Mileski M

Utilization Barriers and Medical Outcomes Commensurate With the Use of Telehealth Among Older Adults: Systematic Review

JMIR Med Inform 2020;8(8):e20359

DOI: 10.2196/20359

PMID: 32784177

PMCID: 7450384

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.