Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 19, 2020
Date Accepted: Sep 7, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Associations Between Patient Health Outcomes and Secure Message Content Exchanged Between Patients and Clinicians: Retrospective Cohort Study

Heisey-Grove D, McClelland LE, Rathert C, Tartaglia A, Jackson K, DeShazo JP

Associations Between Patient Health Outcomes and Secure Message Content Exchanged Between Patients and Clinicians: Retrospective Cohort Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(10):e19477

DOI: 10.2196/19477

PMID: 33118938

PMCID: 7661231

Associations Between Patient Health Outcomes and Secure Message Content Exchanged Between Patients and Clinicians: A Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Dawn Heisey-Grove; 
  • Laura E McClelland; 
  • Cheryl Rathert; 
  • Alexander Tartaglia; 
  • Kevin Jackson; 
  • Jonathan P DeShazo

ABSTRACT

Background:

The number of electronic messages securely exchanged between clinic staff and patients has risen dramatically over the last decade. A variety of studies explored whether the volume of messages sent by patients was associated with outcomes. None of these studies, however, examined whether message content itself was associated with outcomes. Since a secure message thread is considered most like an in-person clinic encounter, it is critical to evaluate the context of the communication to best understand its impact on patient health outcomes.

Objective:

To examine associations between patients’ and clinicians’ message content and changes in patients’ health outcomes.

Methods:

We applied a theory-based taxonomy to 14394 patient- and clinic staff-generated messages derived from patient-initiated message threads. Our study population included 1602 patients, 51% of whom initiated message threads. We conducted linear regression analyses to determine whether message codes were associated with changes in glycemic levels (A1C) in patients with diabetes and changes in systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure in patients with hypertension.

Results:

Patients who initiated threads had larger declines in A1Cs (P=0.01) compared to patients who did not initiate threads. Clinic non-response was associated with decreased SBP (beta=-0.30; 95% CI: -0.56, -0.04), as were staffs’ action responses (beta=-0.30; 95% CI: -0.58, -0.02). Increased DBP, SBP, and A1C were associated with patient-generated appreciation and praise messages and staff encouragement with effect sizes ranging from 0.51 (A1C) to 5.80 (SBP). We found improvements in SBP associated with patients’ complaints (beta=-4.03; 95% CI: -7.94, -0.12). Deferred information sharing by clinic staff was associated with increased SBP (beta=1.29; 95% CI: 0.4-2.19).

Conclusions:

This is the first research to find associations between message content and patients’ health outcomes. Our findings indicate mixed associations between patient message content and patient outcomes. Further research is needed to understand the implications of this work; in the meantime, healthcare providers should be aware that their message content may influence patient health outcomes.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Heisey-Grove D, McClelland LE, Rathert C, Tartaglia A, Jackson K, DeShazo JP

Associations Between Patient Health Outcomes and Secure Message Content Exchanged Between Patients and Clinicians: Retrospective Cohort Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(10):e19477

DOI: 10.2196/19477

PMID: 33118938

PMCID: 7661231

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.