Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Apr 17, 2020
Date Accepted: Mar 3, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

e-Learning for Instruction and to Improve Reproducibility of Scoring Tumor-Stroma Ratio in Colon Carcinoma: Performance and Reproducibility Assessment in the UNITED Study

Smit MA, van Pelt GW, Dequeker EM, Al Dieri R, Tollenaar RA, van Krieken JHJ, Mesker WE, UNITED Group

e-Learning for Instruction and to Improve Reproducibility of Scoring Tumor-Stroma Ratio in Colon Carcinoma: Performance and Reproducibility Assessment in the UNITED Study

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(3):e19408

DOI: 10.2196/19408

PMID: 33739293

PMCID: 8122297

E-learning for instruction and to improve reproducibility of scoring the tumor-stroma ratio in colon carcinoma; the UNITED study

  • Marloes A Smit; 
  • Gabi W van Pelt; 
  • Els MC Dequeker; 
  • Raed Al Dieri; 
  • Rob AEM Tollenaar; 
  • J Han JM van Krieken; 
  • Wilma E Mesker; 
  • UNITED Group

ABSTRACT

Background:

The amount of stroma in the primary tumor is an important prognostic parameter. The tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) was previously validated by international research groups and showed to be a robust prognostic parameter for disease prognosis with good interobserver agreements.

Objective:

The UNITED study (Uniform Noting for International Application of the Tumor-stroma ratio as Easy Diagnostic tool) is developed to bring the TSR to clinical implementation. As part of the study, an E-learning module was developed to confirm the reproducibility of scoring TSR after proper instruction.

Methods:

The E-learning module consisted of an auto-instruction for TSR determination (instruction video or written protocol) and three sets of 40 cases (training-, test- and repetition set). Scoring the TSR is performed on haematoxylin and eosin stained sections and takes only 1-2 minutes per case. Cases are considered stroma-low if the amount of stroma is ≤50%, stroma-high is defined as >50% stroma. In the present study, inter- and intra-observer agreements were determined after each set to evaluate the reproducibility.

Results:

Pathologists and pathology residents (n=63) with special interest in colorectal cancer participated in the E-learning. Forty-nine participants started the E-learning, thirty-one (63%) finished the whole cycle (3 sets). A significant improvement was seen from training set to test set; median kappa improved from K=.72 to K=.77 (p=.002).

Conclusions:

E-learning is an effective method to instruct pathologists and pathology residents for scoring TSR. The reliability of scoring improved from the training to the test set and did not fall back with the repetition set, confirming the reproducibility of the TSR scoring method. Clinical Trial: The UNITED study is registered in the Netherlands Trial Registry (NTR 7270). http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=7270


 Citation

Please cite as:

Smit MA, van Pelt GW, Dequeker EM, Al Dieri R, Tollenaar RA, van Krieken JHJ, Mesker WE, UNITED Group

e-Learning for Instruction and to Improve Reproducibility of Scoring Tumor-Stroma Ratio in Colon Carcinoma: Performance and Reproducibility Assessment in the UNITED Study

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(3):e19408

DOI: 10.2196/19408

PMID: 33739293

PMCID: 8122297

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.