Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Mar 30, 2020
Date Accepted: May 18, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Blended Digital and Face-to-Face Care for First-Episode Psychosis Treatment in Young People: Qualitative Study

Valentine L, McEnery C, Bell I, O'Sullivan S, Pryor I, Gleeson J, Bendall S, Alvarez-Jimenez M

Blended Digital and Face-to-Face Care for First-Episode Psychosis Treatment in Young People: Qualitative Study

JMIR Ment Health 2020;7(7):e18990

DOI: 10.2196/18990

PMID: 32720904

PMCID: 7420518

“Our Online Life is Integrated with Our Physical Life” : End Users’ Perspectives on the Design and Delivery of a Blended Model of Care in First-Episode Psychosis Treatment

  • Lee Valentine; 
  • Carla McEnery; 
  • Imogen Bell; 
  • Shaunagh O'Sullivan; 
  • Ingrid Pryor; 
  • John Gleeson; 
  • Sarah Bendall; 
  • Mario Alvarez-Jimenez

ABSTRACT

Background:

A small number of studies have found that digital mental health interventions can be feasible and acceptable for young people with FEP, however, little research has examined how they might be blended with face-to-face approaches in order to enhance care. The term ‘blended treatment’ refers to the integration of digital and face-to-face mental health care, which has the potential to capitalize on the evidence-based features of both individual modalities, whilst exceeding the sum of its parts by creating online-offline mental health unification. This integration could bridge the online-offline treatment divide and better reflect the interconnected and often complementary ways young people navigate their everyday digital and physical lives.

Objective:

This study aimed to gain young people’s perspectives on the design and implementation of a blended model of care in First-Episode Psychosis treatment.

Methods:

This qualitative study was underpinned by an End-User Development framework and based on semi-structured interviews with 10 participants. A thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.

Results:

Three superordinate themes emerged relating to young people’s perspectives on the design and implementation of a blended model of care in FEP treatment: (i) Blended Features (ii) Cautions, and (iii) Therapeutic Alliance.

Conclusions:

Young people were very enthusiastic about the prospect of blended models of mental health treatment. Aspects of blended treatment that could enhance clinical care were readily identified by young people as; increasing accessibility, continuity, and consolidation, accessing post-therapy support, strengthening the relationship between young person and clinician, and tracking personal data that could be used to better inform clinical decision making. Tone, body language, and facial expressions, however, were identified as important aspects of communication that young people felt would be lacking in a purely digital space. Further, the potential of underreporting symptoms through mood tracking was identified. In conclusion, blended care was identified as an avenue through which to enhance people’s experience of mental health treatment. Future research is needed to investigate the efficacy of blended models of care by evaluating its impact on therapeutic alliance, engagement and treatment effects.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Valentine L, McEnery C, Bell I, O'Sullivan S, Pryor I, Gleeson J, Bendall S, Alvarez-Jimenez M

Blended Digital and Face-to-Face Care for First-Episode Psychosis Treatment in Young People: Qualitative Study

JMIR Ment Health 2020;7(7):e18990

DOI: 10.2196/18990

PMID: 32720904

PMCID: 7420518

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.