Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Mar 30, 2020
Date Accepted: Aug 11, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patient Portal Functionalities and Patient Outcomes Among Patients With Diabetes: Systematic Review

Alturkistani A, Qavi A, Anyanwu PE, Greenfield G, Greaves F, Costelloe C

Patient Portal Functionalities and Patient Outcomes Among Patients With Diabetes: Systematic Review

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(9):e18976

DOI: 10.2196/18976

PMID: 32960182

PMCID: 7539164

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Patient Portal Functionalities and Patient Outcomes Among Diabetes Patients: A Systematic Review

  • Abrar Alturkistani; 
  • Ambar Qavi; 
  • Philip Emeka Anyanwu; 
  • Geva Greenfield; 
  • Felix Greaves; 
  • Ceire Costelloe

ABSTRACT

Background:

Patient portal use could help improve diabetes patients’ care and health outcomes due to the features such as appointment booking, e-messaging, repeat prescription ordering that enable patient-centred care and improved patient self-management of the disease.

Objective:

To assess health and healthcare quality outcomes associated with the use of tethered (portals that are connected to the electronic healthcare record) patient portals by adult patients (18 years or older) with diabetes.

Methods:

We searched the databases including Medline, Embase and Scopus and reported the review methodology using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Three independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, and two reviewers assessed full-texts of relevant studies and performed data extraction and quality assessments of the included studies. We used the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NIH) Study Quality Assessment Tools to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. Data were summarised through narrative synthesis.

Results:

Twelve studies were included in this review. Nine studies reported outcomes related to glycaemic control and most of them found statistically significant associations between using a patient portal and glycaemic control. Some studies also found an inverse association or no association between patient portal use and blood pressure, LDL cholesterol or BMI. Studies reported mixed outcomes regarding the use of patient portals and healthcare utilisation measures such as office visits, emergency department visits and hospitalisations. Few studies reported overall improved quality of care for diabetes patients who used patient portals.

Conclusions:

Studies mostly reported improved health outcomes for diabetes patients who used patient portals. However, the limitations of studying the effects of patient portals exist that do not guarantee whether the outcomes reported were completely a result of patient portal use or if confounding factors exist. Randomised controlled trials and mixed-methods studies could help understand the mechanisms involved in diabetes patient health outcome improvements and patient portal use. Clinical Trial: The protocol of this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42019141131).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Alturkistani A, Qavi A, Anyanwu PE, Greenfield G, Greaves F, Costelloe C

Patient Portal Functionalities and Patient Outcomes Among Patients With Diabetes: Systematic Review

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(9):e18976

DOI: 10.2196/18976

PMID: 32960182

PMCID: 7539164

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.