Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics
Date Submitted: Mar 16, 2020
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 16, 2020 - Mar 18, 2020
Date Accepted: Dec 17, 2020
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Measuring Adoption of Patient Priorities-Aligned Care Using Natural Language Processing of Electronic Health Records
ABSTRACT
Background:
Patient Priorities Care (PPC) is a model of care that align health care recommendations with priorities of older adults with multiple chronic conditions. Following identification of patient priorities, this information is documented in the patient’s electronic health record (EHR).
Objective:
Our goal is to develop and validate a natural language processing (NLP) model that reliably documents when clinicians identify patient priorities (i.e., values, outcome goals and care preferences) within the EHR as a measure of PPC adoption.
Methods:
Design: Retrospective analysis of unstructured EHR free-text notes using an NLP model. Setting: National Veteran Health Administration (VHA) EHR. Participants (including the sample size): 689 patient notes of 470 patients from encounters with 144 social workers Measurements: Each patient’s free-text clinical note was reviewed by two independent reviewers for the presence of PPC language such as priorities, values, and goals. We developed a hybrid NLP model that utilized the rule‐based and statistical machine learning approaches. The performance of the NLP model in training with 10-fold cross-validation and test is reported via precision, recall, F1, and accuracy in comparison to the chart review.
Results:
Out of 689 notes, 491 (71%) were identified as containing PPC language by reviewers (Kappa = 0.97, p-value < 0.001). The NLP model in the validation stage had a precision of 0.85, a recall of 0.90, an F1 of 0.87, and an accuracy of 0.91. The NLP model in the test stage has a precision of 0.94, a recall of 0.89, an F1 of 0.91, and an accuracy of 0.85.
Conclusions:
An automated NLP model can be used to reliably measure with high precision, recall, and accuracy when clinicians document patient priorities as a key step in the adoption of PPC.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.