Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Feb 12, 2020
Date Accepted: May 13, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Shared Decision Making and Patient-Centered Care in Israel, Jordan, and the United States: Exploratory and Comparative Survey Study of Physician Perceptions

Zisman-Ilani Y, Obeidat R, Fang L, Kim YS, Hsieh S, Berger Z

Shared Decision Making and Patient-Centered Care in Israel, Jordan, and the United States: Exploratory and Comparative Survey Study of Physician Perceptions

JMIR Form Res 2020;4(8):e18223

DOI: 10.2196/18223

PMID: 32744509

PMCID: 7432149

Shared decision making and patient-centered care in Israel, Jordan, and the US: An exploratory and comparative study of physician perceptions

  • Yaara Zisman-Ilani; 
  • Rana Obeidat; 
  • Lauren Fang; 
  • Young Shin Kim; 
  • Sarah Hsieh; 
  • Zackary Berger

ABSTRACT

Background:

Shared decision making (SDM) is a central model to support patient engagement in healthcare. SDM evolved in Europe and North America and is largely reflective of the values and medical practices dominant in western countries. Although SDM has become more widely discussed in recent years in non-western countries, less is known about how or whether attitudes, beliefs, and practices regarding patient-centered care exist or differ in various other regions of the world.

Objective:

To compare the beliefs, attitudes, and reported practices of physicians regarding SDM and patient-centered care (PCC) in the Middle East.

Methods:

A hypothesis-generating survey study about the beliefs, attitudes, and practices around SDM and PCC was administered to physicians from the Middle East and to a group of physicians from the US as a comparison.

Results:

A total of 34 surveys were collected via snowball sampling (Jordan n=15, US n=12, Israel n=7). SDM was perceived as a way to inform patients and allowing patient participation, decision, or approval about their care. Barriers for implementing SDM varied based on place of origin; while physicians in the US mentioned limited time, Jordan physicians reported that a lack of education of patients limits SDM practices and in Israel physicians reported lack of communication training. Most US physicians defined PCC as a practice to prioritize patient needs and preferences, while both Jordan and Israel physicians defined PCC as a holistic approach to care and prioritizing patient needs. Barriers to implementing PCC seen by US physicians were mostly centered on limited appointments time and insurance coverage. In Jordan and Israel, staff shortage and the lack of resources in the system were seen as major barriers for PCC implementation. Discussion and

Conclusions:

Our first and exploratory survey of physicians in the Middle East and the USA suggests that perceptions of PCC might widely differ among these regions, while concepts of SDM might be shared. Future work should both clarifies these differences. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Zisman-Ilani Y, Obeidat R, Fang L, Kim YS, Hsieh S, Berger Z

Shared Decision Making and Patient-Centered Care in Israel, Jordan, and the United States: Exploratory and Comparative Survey Study of Physician Perceptions

JMIR Form Res 2020;4(8):e18223

DOI: 10.2196/18223

PMID: 32744509

PMCID: 7432149

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.