Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Feb 12, 2020
Date Accepted: Nov 4, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Acceptability and Efficacy of Electronic Data Collection in a Hospital Neurodevelopmental Clinic: Pilot Questionnaire Study

Patel S, Boulton KA, Redoblado-Hodge A, Papanicolaou A, Barnett D, Bennett B, Drevensek S, Cramsie J, Ganesalingam K, Ong N, Rozsa M, Sutherland R, Williamsz M, Pokorski I, Song Y, Silove N, Guastella AJ

The Acceptability and Efficacy of Electronic Data Collection in a Hospital Neurodevelopmental Clinic: Pilot Questionnaire Study

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(1):e18214

DOI: 10.2196/18214

PMID: 33464217

PMCID: 7854031

The Acceptability and Efficacy of Electronic Data Collection in a Hospital Neurodevelopmental Clinic: A Pilot Study

  • Shrujna Patel; 
  • Kelsie Ann Boulton; 
  • Antoinette Redoblado-Hodge; 
  • Angela Papanicolaou; 
  • Diana Barnett; 
  • Beverley Bennett; 
  • Suzi Drevensek; 
  • Jane Cramsie; 
  • Kalaichelvi Ganesalingam; 
  • Natalie Ong; 
  • Magdalen Rozsa; 
  • Rebecca Sutherland; 
  • Marcia Williamsz; 
  • Izabella Pokorski; 
  • Yun Song; 
  • Natalie Silove; 
  • Adam John Guastella

ABSTRACT

Background:

There is a growing need for cost-efficient and patient-centred approaches to support families in hospital and community-based neurodevelopmental services. For such purposes, electronic data collection (EDC) may hold advantages over paper-based data collection. Such EDC approaches enable automated data collection for scoring and interpretation, saving time for clinicians and services and promoting more efficient service delivery.

Objective:

The current pilot study evaluated the efficacy of EDC for the Child Development Unit, a hospital-based diagnostic assessment clinic in the Sydney Children’s Hospital Network. Caregiver response rates and preference for EDC or paper-based methods were evaluated as well as the moderating role of demographic characteristics such as age, level of education and ethnic background.

Methods:

Families were sent either a paper-based questionnaire via post or an electronic mail link for completion before attending their first onsite clinic appointment for assessment. A total of 62 families were provided a paper version of the questionnaire, while 184 families were provided the online version of the same questionnaire.

Results:

Completion rates of the questionnaire before the first appointment were significantly higher for EDC (89.1%) in comparison to paper-based methods (38.7%; P <.001). Within the EDC group, a vast majority of respondents indicated a preference for completing the questionnaires online (87.3%), compared to paper completion (12.7%; P <.001). Of the caregiver demographic characteristics, only the respondent’s level of education was associated with modality preference, such that those with a higher level of education reported a greater preference for EDC (P = .04).

Conclusions:

These results show that EDC is feasible in hospital-based clinics and has the potential to offer substantial benefits in terms of centralised data collation, time and cost savings, efficiency of service and resource allocation. The results of this study therefore support the continued use of electronic methods to improve family-centred care in clinical practices.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Patel S, Boulton KA, Redoblado-Hodge A, Papanicolaou A, Barnett D, Bennett B, Drevensek S, Cramsie J, Ganesalingam K, Ong N, Rozsa M, Sutherland R, Williamsz M, Pokorski I, Song Y, Silove N, Guastella AJ

The Acceptability and Efficacy of Electronic Data Collection in a Hospital Neurodevelopmental Clinic: Pilot Questionnaire Study

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(1):e18214

DOI: 10.2196/18214

PMID: 33464217

PMCID: 7854031

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.