Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 3, 2020
Date Accepted: Aug 3, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Importance of Multiple Reinforcing Comments and Areas for Change in Optimizing Dietary and Exercise Self-Monitoring Feedback in Behavioral Weight Loss Programs: Factorial Design

Krukowski R, Kim H, Stansbury M, Li Q, Sen S, Farage G, West D

Importance of Multiple Reinforcing Comments and Areas for Change in Optimizing Dietary and Exercise Self-Monitoring Feedback in Behavioral Weight Loss Programs: Factorial Design

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(11):e18104

DOI: 10.2196/18104

PMID: 33226348

PMCID: 7685695

The Importance of Multiple Reinforcing Comments and Areas for Change in Optimizing Dietary and Exercise Self-Monitoring Feedback in Behavioral Weight Loss Programs: A Factorial Design

  • Rebecca Krukowski; 
  • Hyeonju Kim; 
  • Melissa Stansbury; 
  • Qian Li; 
  • Saunak Sen; 
  • Gregory Farage; 
  • Delia West

ABSTRACT

Background:

Individualized dietary and physical activity self-monitoring feedback on the frequency of monitoring, reinforcing comments about positive behaviors as well as specific recommendations for behavior change based on the self-monitoring data is a core element of behavioral weight loss interventions. To our knowledge, no studies have evaluated individuals’ perspectives on composition of feedback messages nor how feedback composition may impact motivation to self-monitor.

Objective:

To assess perceptions of feedback e-mails as a function of the number of comments reinforcing healthy behavior and number of areas for change (i.e., behavior changes that the individual might make to impact weight) identified.

Methods:

E-mailed feedback followed a factorial design with 2 factors (i.e., reinforcing comments, areas for change), each with 3 levels (i.e., 1, 4, or 8 comments). Two hundred and fifty adults with overweight/obesity interested in weight loss were recruited from Qualtrics research panel and read 9 e-mails presented in random order. For each e-mail, respondents answered 8 questions about likelihood to self-monitor in the future and motivation for behavior change, as well as perceptions of the counselor and the e-mail. A mixed effects ordinal logistic model was used to compute conditional odds ratios and predictive margins (i.e., average predicted probability) of the 5-point Likert response scale to investigate an optimal combination level of the two factors.

Results:

E-mails with more reinforcing comments or areas for change were better received, with small incremental benefits for 8 reinforcing comments/areas for change versus 4 reinforcing comments/areas for change. Interactions indicated that the best combination for 3 of 8 outcomes assessed (i.e., motivation to make behavior changes, counselor’s concern for their welfare, perceiving the counselor likes them) was the e-mail with 8 reinforcing comments and 4 areas for change. E-mails with 4 reinforcing comments and 4 areas for change resulted in the highest average probability of individuals reporting being very likely to self-monitor in the future.

Conclusions:

Future studies should explore whether feedback e-mail composition impacts actual self-monitoring performance, but findings suggest how feedback might be optimized for efficacy.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Krukowski R, Kim H, Stansbury M, Li Q, Sen S, Farage G, West D

Importance of Multiple Reinforcing Comments and Areas for Change in Optimizing Dietary and Exercise Self-Monitoring Feedback in Behavioral Weight Loss Programs: Factorial Design

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(11):e18104

DOI: 10.2196/18104

PMID: 33226348

PMCID: 7685695

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.