Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 4, 2020
Date Accepted: May 14, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Artificial Intelligence and Its Effect on Dermatologists’ Accuracy in Dermoscopic Melanoma Image Classification: Web-Based Survey Study

Maron RC, Utikal JS, Hekler A, Hauschild A, Sattler E, Sondermann W, Haferkamp S, Schilling B, Heppt MV, Jansen P, Reinholz M, Franklin C, Schmitt L, Hartmann D, Krieghoff-Henning E, Schmitt M, Weichenthal M, von Kalle C, Fröhling S, Brinker TJ

Artificial Intelligence and Its Effect on Dermatologists’ Accuracy in Dermoscopic Melanoma Image Classification: Web-Based Survey Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(9):e18091

DOI: 10.2196/18091

PMID: 32915161

PMCID: 7519424

Artificial Intelligence and its Effect on Dermatologists’ Accuracy in Dermoscopic Melanoma Image Classification

  • Roman Christoph Maron; 
  • Jochen Sven Utikal; 
  • Achim Hekler; 
  • Axel Hauschild; 
  • Elke Sattler; 
  • Wiebke Sondermann; 
  • Sebastian Haferkamp; 
  • Bastian Schilling; 
  • Markus Vincent Heppt; 
  • Philipp Jansen; 
  • Markus Reinholz; 
  • Cindy Franklin; 
  • Laurenz Schmitt; 
  • Daniela Hartmann; 
  • Eva Krieghoff-Henning; 
  • Max Schmitt; 
  • Michael Weichenthal; 
  • Christof von Kalle; 
  • Stefan Fröhling; 
  • Titus Josef Brinker

ABSTRACT

Background:

Early detection of melanoma is lifesaving but remains challenging. Recent diagnostic studies revealed the superiority of artificial intelligence (AI) to classify dermoscopic images of melanoma and nevi, concluding that these algorithms should assist a dermatologist’s diagnoses.

Objective:

To investigate whether AI support improves the accuracy and overall diagnostic performance of dermatologists in the dichotomous image-based discrimination between melanoma and nevus.

Methods:

Twelve board-certified dermatologists were presented disjoint sets of 100 unique dermoscopic images of melanomas and nevi (total of 1200 unique images), followed by classification of images based on personal experience alone (part I) and with the support of a trained convolutional neural network (CNN; part II). Additionally, dermatologists were asked to rate their confidence in their final decision for each image.

Results:

While dermatologists’ specificity remained almost unchanged (70.7% vs. 72.5%; P=.54) with AI-support, sensitivity and accuracy increased significantly (59.4% vs. 74.5%; P=.003 and 65.0% vs. 73.5%; P=.002 respectively). Additionally, dermatologists’ confidence in their decisions increased when the CNN confirmed their decision and decreased when the CNN disagreed.

Conclusions:

This data indicates that CNN-based image classification is a promising and feasible tool to support clinicians in skin lesions classification and provides a rationale for studies of such classifiers in a real-life setting, where clinicians can integrate additional information such as patient age and medical history into their decisions.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Maron RC, Utikal JS, Hekler A, Hauschild A, Sattler E, Sondermann W, Haferkamp S, Schilling B, Heppt MV, Jansen P, Reinholz M, Franklin C, Schmitt L, Hartmann D, Krieghoff-Henning E, Schmitt M, Weichenthal M, von Kalle C, Fröhling S, Brinker TJ

Artificial Intelligence and Its Effect on Dermatologists’ Accuracy in Dermoscopic Melanoma Image Classification: Web-Based Survey Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(9):e18091

DOI: 10.2196/18091

PMID: 32915161

PMCID: 7519424

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.