Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: May 7, 2020
Date Accepted: Aug 21, 2020
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Evaluating the relationship between Fitbit sleep data and self-reported mood, sleep and environmental contextual factors in healthy adults
ABSTRACT
Background:
Mental Health (MH) disorders can disrupt a person’s sleep resulting in a lower quality of life. Early identification and referral to MH services is a critical need for Active Duty Service Members (ADSM). Wearable technologies like the Fitbit can potentially help address this problem.
Objective:
If Fitbit proves to be an appropriate clinical tool in a military setting, it could provide a potential cost savings, improve clinician access to patient data and create real time treatment options for the greater ADSM population.To assess the relationship between Fitbit sleep data, self-reported mood and environmental contextual factors which may disrupt sleep as a means to determine if the Fitbit device can be used to identify early markers of mental health disorders.
Methods:
TDBThis observational cohort study was conducted at the Madigan Army Medical Center. 17 healthy adults wore a Fitbit Flex for 2 weeks completing a daily self-reported mood and sleep log. Contextual factors were collected with interim and post surveys. Study aims included determining the correlation between Fitbit sleep data and self-reported sleep, number of waking events and self-reported mood and contextual factors of disruptive sleep.
Results:
The Spearman correlation between Fitbit sleep time and self-reported sleep time was moderate (r=0.643, p=0.005). The Spearman correlation between number of waking events and self-reported mood was weak (r=0.354, p=163). Top contextual factors disrupting sleep were “pain”, “noises” and “worries”. A subanalysis of participants reporting “worries” found evidence of potential stress resilience and outliers in waking events.
Conclusions:
Findings contribute valuable evidence on the strength of Fitbit flex as a proxy that is consistent with self-reported sleep data. Mood data alone does not predict number of waking events. Mood and Fitbit data combined with further screening tools may be able to identify markers of underlying mental health disease.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.