Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jan 31, 2020
Date Accepted: Mar 23, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparison of a Collective Intelligence Tailored Messaging System on Smoking Cessation Between African American and White People Who Smoke: Quasi-Experimental Design

Faro J, Nagawa C, Allison JA, Lemon SC, Mazor KM, Houston TK, Sadasivam RS

Comparison of a Collective Intelligence Tailored Messaging System on Smoking Cessation Between African American and White People Who Smoke: Quasi-Experimental Design

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(4):e18064

DOI: 10.2196/18064

PMID: 32338619

PMCID: 7215495

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Impact of a Collective Intelligence Tailored Messaging System on Smoking Cessation between African American and White smokers: A Quasi-experimental Design

  • Jamie Faro; 
  • Catherine Nagawa; 
  • Jeroan A Allison; 
  • Stephenie C Lemon; 
  • Kathleen M Mazor; 
  • Thomas K Houston; 
  • Rajani S Sadasivam

ABSTRACT

Background:

PERSPeCT is a machine learning recommender system with a database of messages to motivate smoking cessation. PERSPeCT uses collective intelligence of users (i.e., preferences and feedback), demographic and smoking profiles to select motivating messages. PERSPeCT may be more beneficial for tailoring content to minority groups influenced by complex, personally relevant factors.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to describe and evaluate the use of PERSPeCT in African American smokers compared to White smokers.

Methods:

Using a quasi-experimental design, we compared African American smokers with a historical cohort of White smokers, who both received up-to 30 daily emailed tailored messages. Smokers rated the daily message in terms of perceived influence on quitting smoking for 30 days. Our primary analysis compared daily message ratings between the two groups using a t-test. We used a logistic model to compare 30-day cessation between the two groups and adjusted for covariates.

Results:

The study included 119 smokers (African Americans n=55; Whites n=64). At baseline, African American smokers were significantly more likely to report allowing smoking in the home (P<.01); all other characteristics were not significantly different between groups. Daily mean ratings were higher for African American than White smokers on 26 of the 30 days (P<.01). Odds of quitting as measured by 30-day cessation were significantly higher for African Americans (Odds Ratio: 2.3, 95% CI 1.04, 5.53, P=.03) and did not change after adjusting for allowing smoking at home.

Conclusions:

Our study highlighted the potential of using a recommender system to personalize for African American smokers. Clinical Trial: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02200432; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02200432


 Citation

Please cite as:

Faro J, Nagawa C, Allison JA, Lemon SC, Mazor KM, Houston TK, Sadasivam RS

Comparison of a Collective Intelligence Tailored Messaging System on Smoking Cessation Between African American and White People Who Smoke: Quasi-Experimental Design

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(4):e18064

DOI: 10.2196/18064

PMID: 32338619

PMCID: 7215495

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.