Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jan 28, 2020
Date Accepted: Feb 26, 2020
Date Submitted to PubMed: May 1, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Internet Influence of Assisted Reproduction Technology Centers in China: Qualitative Study Based on WeChat Official Accounts

He Z, Zhu Z, Wang X, Zhang J, Shan J, Pan J, Shao F, Wang H

Internet Influence of Assisted Reproduction Technology Centers in China: Qualitative Study Based on WeChat Official Accounts

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(6):e17997

DOI: 10.2196/17997

PMID: 32357124

PMCID: 7315359

Construction and Analysis of an Internet Influence Measurement Model of Assisted Reproduction Technology Centers in China

  • Zhiqiang He; 
  • Zheng Zhu; 
  • Xiang Wang; 
  • Jianping Zhang; 
  • Jinhua Shan; 
  • Jiajia Pan; 
  • Fang Shao; 
  • Hui Wang

ABSTRACT

Background:

The prevalence of infertility in China is high, but the advent of assisted reproduction technology (ART) has greatly eased this situation. Social media, such as WeChat official accounts, have become the preferred tool for ART centers to communicate with patients, but their attention and operational status differ, and the Internet influence of WeChat official accounts is insufficient. In addition, questions about whether Internet influence is consistent with academic influence and whether the Internet can influence patients' choice of medical treatment to a certain extent have not been explored.

Objective:

This study examined the operational status and Internet influence of WeChat official accounts for ART centers, and explores the degree of Internet influence on patients' choices of medical treatment.

Methods:

We collected information from the WeChat official accounts for ART centers approved by the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China (NHCPRC), and used the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to build an Internet influence model of the ART centers, and obtained a Ranking of Internet Influence on Reproductive Centers (RIIRC) for each center.

Results:

We found there were 451 ART centers throughout the country by the end of 2016 and 498 by the end of 2018. The number of medical institutions is quite large, but their distribution is uneven, and their level of medical technical ability is very different. Analysis of the text data of posts of WeChat official accounts showed the ART centers have insufficient awareness of network exposure and publicity, and the RIIRC of some medical institutions was inconsistent with their medical level and academic status.

Conclusions:

ART institutions have varying degrees of emphasis and use of WeChat official accounts in China. They fail to realize that the Internet influence of WeChat may bring them potential patient resources and that Internet influence may affect the future market structure of ART and potentially affect academic rankings.


 Citation

Please cite as:

He Z, Zhu Z, Wang X, Zhang J, Shan J, Pan J, Shao F, Wang H

Internet Influence of Assisted Reproduction Technology Centers in China: Qualitative Study Based on WeChat Official Accounts

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(6):e17997

DOI: 10.2196/17997

PMID: 32357124

PMCID: 7315359

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.