Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Dec 20, 2019
Date Accepted: Mar 23, 2020
Date Submitted to PubMed: Apr 29, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Influences on the Uptake of and Engagement With Health and Well-Being Smartphone Apps: Systematic Review

Szinay D, Jones A, Chadborn T, Brown J, Naughton F

Influences on the Uptake of and Engagement With Health and Well-Being Smartphone Apps: Systematic Review

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(5):e17572

DOI: 10.2196/17572

PMID: 32348255

PMCID: 7293059

Influences on uptake of and engagement with health and wellbeing smartphone apps: a systematic review.

  • Dorothy Szinay; 
  • Andy Jones; 
  • Tim Chadborn; 
  • Jamie Brown; 
  • Felix Naughton

ABSTRACT

Background:

The public health impact of health and wellbeing digital interventions is dependent upon sufficient real-world uptake and engagement. Uptake is currently dependent largely on popularity indicators (e.g. ranking and user ratings on app stores), which may not correspond with effectiveness, and rapid disengagement is common. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify factors that influence uptake and engagement with health and wellbeing apps to inform new approaches that promote the effective use of such tools.

Objective:

To synthesise what is known about influences on the uptake of and engagement with health and wellbeing smartphone apps amongst adults.

Methods:

A systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies. Studies conducted on adults were included if they focused on health and wellbeing smartphone apps reporting on uptake and engagement behaviour. Studies identified through a systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Scopus, Cochrane library databases, DBLP and ACM Digital library were screened, with a proportion screened independently by two authors. Data synthesis and interpretation was undertaken using a deductive iterative process. External validity checking was undertaken by an independent researcher. A narrative synthesis of the findings was structured around the components of the COM-B behaviour change model and the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Results:

Out of 7640 identified studies, 42 were included in the review. Under ‘Capability’, the main factors identified were app literacy skills, user knowledge, including app awareness, available user guidance, health information, statistical information on progress, well-designed reminders, features to reduce cognitive load, and self-monitoring features. Availability at low cost, positive tone and personalisation were identified as physical ‘Opportunity’ factors, while recommendations for health and wellbeing apps, embedded health professional support together with social networking possibilities were social ‘Opportunity’ factors. Finally, ‘Motivation’ factors included positive feedback, available rewards, goal setting and the perceived utility of the app.

Conclusions:

Across a wide range of populations and behaviours, twenty-six diverse factors relating to capability, opportunity and motivation appear to influence the uptake of and engagement with health and wellbeing smartphone apps. Further investigation of these factors, including where there are contradictory findings, and clearer reporting is required to advance the field. Clinical Trial: Protocol registration: PROSPERO 2019: CRD42019120312; Available from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=120312


 Citation

Please cite as:

Szinay D, Jones A, Chadborn T, Brown J, Naughton F

Influences on the Uptake of and Engagement With Health and Well-Being Smartphone Apps: Systematic Review

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(5):e17572

DOI: 10.2196/17572

PMID: 32348255

PMCID: 7293059

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.