Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Dec 5, 2019
Date Accepted: Mar 12, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Content and Quality of Infant Feeding Smartphone Apps: Five-Year Update on a Systematic Search and Evaluation

Cheng H, Tutt A, Llewellyn C, Size D, Jones J, Taki S, Rossiter C, Denney-Wilson E

Content and Quality of Infant Feeding Smartphone Apps: Five-Year Update on a Systematic Search and Evaluation

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(5):e17300

DOI: 10.2196/17300

PMID: 32459187

PMCID: 7287747

Information and Quality in Infant Feeding Smartphone Apps: a five-year update on a Systematic Search and Evaluation

  • Heilok Cheng; 
  • Alison Tutt; 
  • Catherine Llewellyn; 
  • Donna Size; 
  • Jennifer Jones; 
  • Sarah Taki; 
  • Chris Rossiter; 
  • Elizabeth Denney-Wilson

ABSTRACT

Background:

Parents use apps to access health information, but there are no standards for providing evidence-based advice, support and information. Well-developed apps that promote appropriate infant feeding and play can support healthy growth and development. A 2015 systematic review of smartphone apps in Australia about infant feeding and play found most apps had minimal information, with poor readability and app quality.

Objective:

This review systematically evaluated the information and quality of smartphone apps providing information on breastfeeding, formula feeding, introducing solids or infant play for consumers.

Methods:

The Google Play and App Store was searched for free and paid Android and iOS apps, using key terms for infant feeding, breastfeeding, formula feeding and tummy time. Apps were evaluated between September 2018 and January 2019, for information content based on Australian guidelines, app quality using the 5-point Mobile App Rating Scale, readability, and suitability of health information.

Results:

2196 unique apps were found and screened, with 47 included for evaluation. 11 apps had affiliations to universities and health services, as app developers, writers or editors. 33 apps were commercially developed. The majority of apps were found through search key terms breastfeeding or formula feeding (32 apps). Most apps contained information that was incorrect, insufficient or inconsistent with Australian guidelines on infant nutrition. Subjective app assessment by healthcare practitioners on whether they would use, purchase or recommend the app was scored as poor to acceptable (median 2.50). Objective app assessment on engagement, functionality, aesthetics and information was scored as acceptable (median 3.63). The median readability score for apps was at the American Grade 8 reading level. Suitability of health information was rated superior for content, reading demand, layout and interaction with readers.

Conclusions:

Quality of smartphone apps on infant feeding and activity was moderate, based on objective measurements of engagement, functionality, aesthetics and information from a reliable source. Overall quality of information on infant feeding and activity was poor, indicated by low coverage of topics, and incomplete or partially complete information. The key areas for improvement involved providing evidence-based information consistent with the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Infant Feeding Guidelines. Apps supported and developed by health care professionals with adequate health service funding can ensure that parents are provided with credible and reliable resources. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Cheng H, Tutt A, Llewellyn C, Size D, Jones J, Taki S, Rossiter C, Denney-Wilson E

Content and Quality of Infant Feeding Smartphone Apps: Five-Year Update on a Systematic Search and Evaluation

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(5):e17300

DOI: 10.2196/17300

PMID: 32459187

PMCID: 7287747

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.