Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Nov 22, 2019
Date Accepted: Jun 13, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Conversational Agents in Health Care: Scoping Review and Conceptual Analysis

Tudor Car L, Dhinagaran DA, Kyaw BM, Kowatsch T, Rayhan JS, Theng YL, Atun R

Conversational Agents in Health Care: Scoping Review and Conceptual Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(8):e17158

DOI: 10.2196/17158

PMID: 32763886

PMCID: 7442948

Conversational agents in healthcare: a scoping review and conceptual analysis

  • Lorainne Tudor Car; 
  • Dhakshenya Ardhithy Dhinagaran; 
  • Bhone Myint Kyaw; 
  • Tobias Kowatsch; 
  • Joty Shafiq Rayhan; 
  • Yin Leng Theng; 
  • Rifat Atun

ABSTRACT

Background:

Conversational agents also known as chatbots are computer programs designed to simulate human text or verbal conversations. They are increasingly used in a range of fields, including healthcare. By enabling better accessibility, personalization and efficiency, conversational agents have the potential to improve patient care.

Objective:

To review the current applications, gaps and challenges in the literature on conversational agents in healthcare and provide recommendations for their future research, design and application.

Methods:

We performed a scoping review. A broad literature search was done in Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane central with the search terms “conversational agents”, “conversational AI”, “chatbots” and associated synonyms. We also searched grey literature using sources such as OCLC World Cat database and Research Gate in April 2019. Reference lists of relevant articles were checked for further articles. Screening and data extraction were performed in parallel by two review authors. The included evidence was analysed narratively employing the principles of thematic analysis.

Results:

The literature search yielded 44 study reports (42 articles and two ongoing clinical trials) which matched the inclusion criteria. The identified conversational agents were largely Machine learning-based (n=32), smartphone applications-delivered (n=17) and used text as the main input (n=25) and output (n=26) modality. Case-studies describing chatbot development (n=18) were most prevalent and only ten RCTs were identified. Three most commonly reported conversational agent applications in the literature were treatment and monitoring, healthcare service support, and patient education.

Conclusions:

The literature on conversational agents in healthcare is largely descriptive and aimed at treatment and monitoring and health service support. It mostly reports on text-based, machine learning-driven and mobile application-delivered conversational agents. There is an urgent need for robust evaluation of diverse healthcare conversational agents’ formats focusing on their acceptability, safety and effectiveness.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tudor Car L, Dhinagaran DA, Kyaw BM, Kowatsch T, Rayhan JS, Theng YL, Atun R

Conversational Agents in Health Care: Scoping Review and Conceptual Analysis

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(8):e17158

DOI: 10.2196/17158

PMID: 32763886

PMCID: 7442948

The author of this paper has made a PDF available, but requires the user to login, or create an account.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.