Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Nov 17, 2019
Date Accepted: Mar 29, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Acceptability of an Embodied Conversational Agent for Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support via a Smartphone App: Mixed Methods Study

Baptista S, Wadley G, Bird D, Oldenburg B, Speight J

Acceptability of an Embodied Conversational Agent for Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support via a Smartphone App: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(7):e17038

DOI: 10.2196/17038

PMID: 32706734

PMCID: 7407258

Acceptability of an embodied conversational agent for type 2 diabetes self-management education and support via a smartphone app: a mixed-methods study.

  • Shaira Baptista; 
  • Greg Wadley; 
  • Dominique Bird; 
  • Brian Oldenburg; 
  • Jane Speight

ABSTRACT

Background:

Embodied conversational agents (ECAs) are increasingly used in healthcare applications (apps) however their acceptability in type 2 diabetes (T2D) self-management apps has not yet been investigated.

Objective:

To evaluate the acceptability of the ECA ‘Laura’ used to deliver diabetes self-management education and support in the ‘My Diabetes Coach (MDC)’ app.

Methods:

A sequential mixed methods design was applied. Participants accessed the MDC app over a 6-month period and then completed questions assessing their interaction with, and attitudes to, the ECA. In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with a sub-sample to explore users’ experiences of the ECA. Quantitative and qualitative data were interpreted through integrated synthesis.

Results:

Of the 93 participants, 44 (47.3%) were women, mean±SD age was 55±10 years and baseline HbA1c was 7.3±1.5%. Sixty-seven (72%) participants provided responses at 6-months post-baseline. Of these, most described Laura as being helpful (85%), friendly (85%), competent (84%), trustworthy (72%), and likable (60%). A substantial minority described Laura as not real (39%), boring (39%) and annoying (30%). Participants reported that interacting with Laura made them feel more motivated (43%), comfortable (36%), confident (21%), happy (16%) and hopeful (12%). Nineteen percent were frustrated by their interaction with Laura and 16% of participants reported that interacting with Laura made them feel guilty. Four themes were identified from the qualitative data (N=19): 1) Laura’s perceived role; 2) Laura’s value add to self-management; 3) Laura’s ‘human-like’ nature and 4) Laura’s shortcomings.

Conclusions:

These findings suggest an ECA is an acceptable means to deliver T2D self-management education and support. A human-like character providing friendly, non-judgemental support is well-received. ECAs can provide enhanced support by increasing relational communication, providing ongoing emotional support, and alleviating some of the burden associated with T2D self-management. Nevertheless, the ECA’s communication can be improved with greater congruence between its verbal and non-verbal communication and by accommodating user preferences based on their existing expertise, expectations and management style . Clinical Trial: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ID CTRN12614001229662


 Citation

Please cite as:

Baptista S, Wadley G, Bird D, Oldenburg B, Speight J

Acceptability of an Embodied Conversational Agent for Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support via a Smartphone App: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(7):e17038

DOI: 10.2196/17038

PMID: 32706734

PMCID: 7407258

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.