Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Sep 19, 2019
Date Accepted: Feb 21, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Implementation Determinants and Outcomes of a Technology-Enabled Service Targeting Suicide Risk in High Schools: Mixed Methods Study

Adrian M

Implementation Determinants and Outcomes of a Technology-Enabled Service Targeting Suicide Risk in High Schools: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Ment Health 2020;7(7):e16338

DOI: 10.2196/16338

PMID: 32706691

PMCID: 7399956

Implementation Determinants and Outcomes for a Technology Enabled Service Targeting Suicide Risk in High Schools

  • Molly Adrian

ABSTRACT

Background:

Background:

Technology enabled services (TES), which integrate human service and digital components, are increasingly popular strategies to increase the reach and impact of mental health interventions, but large-scale implementation of TES has lagged behind their potential.

Objective:

Objective:

This research applied a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach to gather input from multiple key user groups (students and educators) and understand the factors that support successful implementation (implementation determinants) and implementation outcomes for a TES for universal screening, ongoing monitoring, and support for suicide risk management in the school setting.

Methods:

Methods:

Students (N=111) in 9th to 12th grade completed measures regarding implementation outcomes (acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness) via open-ended survey. Nine school personnel (school-based mental health clinicians, nurses, administrators) completed lab-based usability testing of a dashboard tracking suicide risk of students, quantitative measures, and qualitative interviews to understand key implementation outcomes and determinants. School personnel were presented with a series of scenarios and common tasks focused on basic features and functions of the dashboard. Directed content analysis based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to extract multilevel determinants (i.e., the barriers or facilitators at the levels of the outer setting, inner setting, individuals, intervention, and implementation process) related to positive implementation outcomes for the TES.

Results:

Results:

Overarching themes related to implementation determinants and outcomes suggest that both student and school personnel users view TES for suicide prevention as moderately feasible and acceptable. Qualitative results suggest that students and school personnel view passive data collection based on social media data as a relative advantage to the current system; however, findings indicate that the TES and the school setting need to address issues

Conclusions:

Innovative suicide prevention strategies that rely on passive data collection in the school context are a promising and appealing idea. Usability testing identified key issues for revision to facilitate wide spread implementation.of privacy, integration into existing workflows and communication patterns, and options for individualization for student-centered care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Adrian M

Implementation Determinants and Outcomes of a Technology-Enabled Service Targeting Suicide Risk in High Schools: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Ment Health 2020;7(7):e16338

DOI: 10.2196/16338

PMID: 32706691

PMCID: 7399956

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.