Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Jul 23, 2019
Date Accepted: Mar 28, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Value of Eye-Tracking Data for Classification of Information Processing–Intensive Handling Tasks: Quasi-Experimental Study on Cognition and User Interface Design

Hess S, Lohmeyer Q, Wahlen D, Neumann S, Groebli JC, Meboldt M

Value of Eye-Tracking Data for Classification of Information Processing–Intensive Handling Tasks: Quasi-Experimental Study on Cognition and User Interface Design

JMIR Hum Factors 2020;7(2):e15581

DOI: 10.2196/15581

PMID: 32490840

PMCID: 7301256

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Benchmarking User Interface Designs of a Patient Assistance Device for Peritoneal Dialysis: Quantitative Evaluation with Mobile Eye Tracking

  • Stephan Hess; 
  • Quentin Lohmeyer; 
  • Dimitri Wahlen; 
  • Sandra Neumann; 
  • Jean-Claude Groebli; 
  • Mirko Meboldt

ABSTRACT

Background:

In order to give a wide range of people the opportunity to ensure and support home care, one approach is to develop medical devices that are as user-friendly as possible. This allows non-experts to use medical devices that were originally too complicated to use. For a user-centric development of such medical devices, it is essential to understand which user interface design best supports patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals.

Objective:

Using the benefits of mobile eye tracking, this work aims to gain a deeper understanding of the challenges of user cognition. As a consequence, its goal is to identify the obstacles to the usability of the features of two different designs of a single medical device user interface. The medical device is a patient assistance device for home use in peritoneal dialysis therapy.

Methods:

A total of 15 seniors (74.0 years on average) and 10 young adults (25.1 years on average) were recruited and participated in this study. The handling cycle consisted of seven main tasks. The data analysis started with the analysis of task effectiveness for searching for error-related tasks. Subsequently, the in-depth gaze data analysis focused on these identified critical tasks. In order to understand the challenges of user cognition in critical tasks, gaze data was analysed with respect to individual user interface features of the medical device system. Therefore, it focused on the two dimensions of dwell time and fixation duration of the gaze.

Results:

In total, 97% of the handling steps for design 1 and 96% for design 2 were performed correctly, with the main challenges being task 1 insert, task 2 connect and task 6 disconnect for both designs. In order to understand the two analyzed dimensions of the physiological measurements simultaneously, the authors propose a new graphical representation. It distinguishes four different patterns to compare the eye movements associated with the two designs. The patterns identified for the critical tasks are consistent with the results of the task performance.

Conclusions:

This study showed that mobile eye tracking provides objective quantitative results based on physiological measurements related to individual user interface features. The evaluation of each individual feature of the user interface promises an optimal design by combining the best found features. In this way, manufacturers are able to develop products that can be used by untrained users without prior knowledge. This would allow home care to be provided not only by highly qualified nurses and caregivers, but also by patients themselves, partners, children or neighbors. Clinical Trial: The study was reviewed by the Swiss Ethics Committees on research involving humans (Req-2017-00832). It was assessed to not fall under the Human Research Act (HRA).


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hess S, Lohmeyer Q, Wahlen D, Neumann S, Groebli JC, Meboldt M

Value of Eye-Tracking Data for Classification of Information Processing–Intensive Handling Tasks: Quasi-Experimental Study on Cognition and User Interface Design

JMIR Hum Factors 2020;7(2):e15581

DOI: 10.2196/15581

PMID: 32490840

PMCID: 7301256

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.