Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols
Date Submitted: Jul 18, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 22, 2019 - Sep 16, 2019
Date Accepted: Jan 14, 2020
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Partnerships between deaf people and hearing dogs (PEDRO): Protocol for a single-centre randomised superiority study to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of receiving a hearing dog on mental wellbeing and health
ABSTRACT
Background People with hearing loss, particularly those who lose their hearing in adulthood, are at increased risk of social isolation, mental health difficulties, unemployment, loss of independence, risk of accidents, and impaired quality of life. In the United Kingdom (UK), a single third sector organisation provides hearing dogs (HDs), a specific type of assistance dog trained to provide sound support to people with hearing loss. These dogs may also deliver numerous psychosocial benefits to recipients. This has not previously been fully investigated. Objective To evaluate the impact of a hearing dog partnership on the lives of individuals with severe or profound hearing loss. Methods and Analysis A two-arm, randomised controlled trial conducted within the UK, with 162 HD applicants, aged 18 years and over. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive a HD sooner than usual (intervention arm – Arm B) or to receive a HD within the usual timeframe (comparator arm – Arm A). In the effectiveness analysis, the primary outcome is a comparison of mental wellbeing six-months after Arm B have received a HD (Arm A: not yet received HD), measured using the Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale. Secondary outcome measures include the PHQ-9, GAD-7 and WSAS. An economic evaluation will assess cost-effectiveness including health-related quality-adjusted life years using the EQ-5D-5L and social-care-related-quality-adjusted life-years. Participants will be followed up for up to 2 years. A nested qualitative study will investigate the impacts of having a HD and how these impacts come about. Ethics and dissemination The study received ethical approval from the University of York’s Department of Social Policy and Social Work Research Ethics Committee. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and at conferences. A summary of the findings will be made available to participants. Trial registration number ISRCTN36452009 (Retrospectively registered). Protocol version: 3, 12.2.2019
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.