Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jul 13, 2019
Date Accepted: Mar 29, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Views of Swedish Elder Care Personnel on Ongoing Digital Transformation: Cross-Sectional Study

Baudin K, Gustafsson C, Frennert S

Views of Swedish Elder Care Personnel on Ongoing Digital Transformation: Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(6):e15450

DOI: 10.2196/15450

PMID: 32543444

PMCID: 7327600

Ongoing Digital Transformation: A Cross-sectional Study on the Views of Swedish Elder Care Personnel

  • Katarina Baudin; 
  • Christine Gustafsson; 
  • Susanne Frennert

ABSTRACT

Background:

Swedish municipalities are facing demographic challenges due to the growing number of older people and the resulting increased need for health care services. Welfare technologies are being launched as possible solutions for meeting some of these challenges

Objective:

The aim of this study is to explore the perception, experimentation, evaluation and procurement of welfare technology practices among care professionals working in municipal elder care in relation to their gender, age, and profession

Methods:

Data for this explorative cross-sectional study were collected from 393 responses to a web-based survey on municipal elder care in Sweden. Chi square tests were performed to determine the associations.

Results:

The results show gender, age, and professional differences in municipal elder care workers. Differences were particularly evident in attitudes toward technology, the use of technology in general and in the workplace, and involvement and participation in decision-making regarding the procurement of new welfare technologies. The results shows that men (69%) have a more positive attitude toward and curiosity regarding new technologies than women (47%) (p-value =.03). Regarding age, the younger respondents (18-24 years) perceived the digital transformation in the workplace “too slow” (100%), while the majority of older respondents (65-74 years) perceived it as happening at the “right pace” (57%). The results revealed that the elder care personnel felt encouraged by managament to explore and experiment with new WT, but never did with either management or patients. The study also explored that even though the majority of the respondents were women, more men (57%) were involved in the procurement process for WT devices and solutions than women (29%) (p-value =.00).

Conclusions:

Personnel working within municipal elder care were generally very positive toward new technologies. However, both gender and age differences may influence, for example, personnel’s resistance to welfare technology and patients’ participation in welfare technology usage and deployment. Different levels of participation in the decision-making process regarding new technology deployment may negatively affect the overall digital transformation within municipal elder care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Baudin K, Gustafsson C, Frennert S

Views of Swedish Elder Care Personnel on Ongoing Digital Transformation: Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(6):e15450

DOI: 10.2196/15450

PMID: 32543444

PMCID: 7327600

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.